American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 1265-1268, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Acute appendicitis in children: value of sonography in detecting perforation

SP Quillin, MJ Siegel and CM Coffin
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

OBJECTIVE. We determined the sonographic features of perforating appendicitis in children in order to determine the best criteria for establishing the diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sonograms of the right lower quadrants of 71 children with proved appendicitis were reviewed to determine the value of sonography in distinguishing between nonperforating and perforating appendicitis. The sonographic signs evaluated included the presence or absence of an appendix, an echogenic submucosal layer, increased periappendiceal echogenicity, free or loculated periappendiceal or pelvic fluid collections, and appendicoliths. The sonographic findings were correlated with the surgical and pathologic findings. RESULTS. Forty-five patients had nonperforating appendicitis, and 26 had perforating appendicitis. A sonographically visible appendix was present in all patients with nonperforating appendicitis and in 10 (38%) of 26 patients with perforation. An echogenic submucosa was noted in 27 (60%) of 45 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis but in only three (30%) of 10 patients with a visible appendix and perforating appendicitis (p < .05). In 19 of 26 patients with perforating appendicitis, sonography showed loculated periappendiceal or pelvic fluid collections; no patient with nonperforating appendicitis had a loculated fluid collection (p < .05). No statistically significant association was found between the presence or absence of perforation and free pelvic fluid, prominent periappendiceal fat, or an appendicolith. CONCLUSION. Our results indicate that sonography can be helpful in the diagnosis of perforating appendicitis. The best predictors of perforation are absence of the echogenic submucosal layer and the presence of a loculated fluid collection.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tsuboi, K. Takase, I. Kaneda, T. Ishibashi, T. Yamada, M. Kitami, S. Higano, and S. Takahashi Perforated and Nonperforated Appendicitis: Defect in Enhancing Appendiceal Wall Depiction with Multi Detector Row CT Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E M Anderson and H K Bungay Imaging investigation of acute right iliac fossa pain Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 257 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Doria, R. Moineddin, C. J. Kellenberger, M. Epelman, J. Beyene, S. Schuh, P. S. Babyn, and P. T. Dick US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Noguchi, K. Yoshimitsu, and M. Yoshida Periappendiceal Hyperechoic Structure on Sonography: A Sign of Severe Appendicitis J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 323 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Sivit, M. J. Siegel, K. E. Applegate, and K. D. Newman When Appendicitis Is Suspected in Children RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 247 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Birnbaum and S. R. Wilson Appendicitis at the Millennium Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 337 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. P. Ledermann, N. Borner, H. Strunk, G. Bongartz, C. Zollikofer, and G. Stuckmann Bowel Wall Thickening on Transabdominal Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 107 - 115. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Rapp, A. T. Stavros, and P. R. Meyers Ultrasound of the Normal Appendix: The How and Why Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1998; 14(5): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]