American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 111-115, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases

ZS Kiss, KM Khan and PJ Fuller
Department of Radiology, Mercy Private Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to present the CT findings in 55 cases of tarsal navicular stress fracture before and after treatment and to describe the CT protocol used. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-five navicular stress fractures in 54 patients whose initial and follow-up CT scans were available for study were retrospectively reviewed. In most cases, contiguous 1.5-mm axial and 3-mm coronal scans of the navicular bone had been obtained. Both feet were scanned for comparison. Follow-up scans were obtained between 4 weeks and 6 years. RESULTS. On review, fractures were evident in all cases, but six small fractures (11%) were missed at the initial interpretation. All fractures involved the central third of the proximal dorsal margin of the navicular bone. Fifty-three fractures (96%) were partial. Forty- three partial fractures were linear, five were linear with bone fragments, and five were rim defects with ossicles. In 13 cases (24%) the fracture was small, 10% or less of bone height. The earliest sign of healing, slight dorsal cortical bridging, was seen in three of eight cases in which follow-up was done at 6 weeks. Firm cortical union was noted in 10 (32%) of 31 by 4 months. Nonunion occurred in 12 and was indicated by the persistence of the fracture gap and lack of cortical healing. Medullary cysts (five) and cortical notching (two) were noted to persist after complete healing. CONCLUSION. CT scanning is a suitable method for detecting navicular stress fracture and for performing follow-up examinations. Small fractures may be overlooked owing to lack of familiarity with their appearance.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Shanmugam and N. Maffulli Sports injuries in children Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2008; 86(1): 33 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N J Potter, P D Brukner, M Makdissi, K Crossley, Z S Kiss, and C Bradshaw Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management * Commentary Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2006; 40(8): 692 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Burne, C. M. Mahoney, B. B. Forster, M. S. Koehle, J. E. Taunton, and K. M. Khan Tarsal Navicular Stress Injury: Long-term Outcome and Clinicoradiological Correlation Using Both Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1875 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Sharma, K. Luscombe, and N Maffulli Sports injuries in children Trauma, October 1, 2003; 5(4): 245 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Bennell, S. A. Malcolm, S. A. Thomas, S. J. Reid, P. D. Brukner, P. R. Ebeling, and J. D. Wark Risk Factors for Stress Fractures in Track and Field Athletes: A Twelve-Month Prospective Study Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1996; 24(6): 810 - 818. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Bennell, S. A. Malcolm, S. A. Thomas, J. D. Wark, and P. D. Brukner The Incidence and Distribution of Stress Fractures in Competitive Track and Field Athletes: A Twelve-Month Prospective Study Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]