|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 285-289, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
P Soyer, D Lacheheb and M Levesque
Department of Radiology, Hopital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
OBJECTIVE. A retrospective study was performed to determine the causes of false-positive diagnoses based on CT findings obtained during superior mesenteric arterial portography (CT portography) and to correlate the imaging characteristics of the incorrectly diagnosed lesions with their pathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a series of 52 patients who had CT portography before surgical exploration of the liver, eight had a total of 10 false-positive findings, yielding a false-positive diagnosis rate of 15%. In eight cases, the false-positive findings from CT portography were correlated with the histologic material obtained during partial hepatic resection or intraoperative biopsies at the corresponding sites. RESULTS. Of the 10 false-positive findings on CT portograms, seven led to false- positive diagnoses of hepatic tumors. Conversely, three nontumorous false-positive findings were erroneously considered to be portal perfusion defects. The final diagnoses based on pathologic findings included focal fatty infiltration of the liver (three), cirrhosis (two), and portal perfusion defect (three). Two false-positive findings for which no histologic correlation was possible were considered to be portal perfusion defects on the basis of intraoperative findings. CONCLUSION. Recognition of false-positive findings is crucial in the preoperative evaluation of hepatic tumors because the findings may be interpreted as contraindications for surgery in patients who have operable tumors. The pathologic correlations show that several different entities can cause diagnoses based on CT portographic findings to be false-positive. However, differentiating between those entities remains a diagnostic challenge.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. P. Hosch, S. M. Schmidt, S. Plaza, C. Dechow, J. Schmidt, S. Ley, G. W. Kauffmann, and J. Hansmann Comparison of CT during arterial portography and MR during arterial portography in the detection of liver metastases. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1502 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. E. Steingruber, A. Mallouhi, B. V. Czermak, P. Waldenberger, E. Gassner, F. Offner, A. Chemelli, A. Koenigsrainer, W. Vogel, and W. R. Jaschke Pretransplantation Evaluation of the Cirrhotic Liver with Explantation Correlation: Accuracy of CT Arterioportography and Digital Subtraction Hepatic Angiography in Revealing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 99 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Kim, T. K. Kim, K.-B. Sung, H.-K. Yoon, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, A. Y. Kim, H. J. Kim, and M.-G. Lee Preoperative Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Combined Use of CT with Arterial Portography and Hepatic Arteriography Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1593 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Kim, T. K. Kim, K.-B. Sung, H.-K. Yoon, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, A. Y. Kim, H. J. Kim, and M.-G. Lee CT during Hepatic Arteriography and Portography: An Illustrative Review RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1041 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshimitsu, H. Honda, T. Kuroiwa, H. Irie, H. Aibe, K. Shinozaki, and K. Masuda Unusual Hemodynamics and Pseudolesions of the Noncirrhotic Liver at CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S81 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Choi, S. H. Kim, J. H. Lim, W. J. Lee, H.-J. Jang, S. J. Lee, and H. K. Lim Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ferumoxides-Enhanced MR Imaging Versus Combined Helical CT During Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Reimer, N. Jähnke, M. Fiebich, W. Schima, F. Deckers, C. Marx, N. Holzknecht, and S. Saini Hepatic Lesion Detection and Characterization: Value of Nonenhanced MR Imaging, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging, and Spiral CT-ROC Analysis Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 152 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Jang, J. H. Lim, S. J. Lee, C. K. Park, H. S. Park, and Y. S. Do Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Are Combined CT during Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography in Addition to Triple-Phase Helical CT All Necessary for Preoperative Evaluation? Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 373 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lim, E. Y. Kim, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, Y. S. Do, I.-W. Choo, and C. K. Park Regenerative Nodules in Liver Cirrhosis: Findings at CT during Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography with Histopathologic Correlation Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ward, K. S. Naik, J. A. Guthrie, D. Wilson, and P. J. Robinson Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of MR Imaging after the Administration of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with Dual-Phase CT by Using Alternative–Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |