AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Disler, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Disler, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 343-345, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Meniscal tears of the knee: preliminary comparison of three-dimensional MR reconstruction with two-dimensional MR imaging and arthroscopy

DG Disler, SV Kattapuram, FS Chew, DI Rosenthal and D Patel
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

OBJECTIVE. A pilot study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) MR reconstructions in detecting meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Reconstructions of 24 knee menisci were made by using data from standard two-dimensional (2D) MR images. The results were compared with findings on 2D MR images and at arthroscopy. RESULTS. All 17 arthroscopically proved meniscal tears were shown on the 3D reconstructions. Seven tears in five patients were shown on 3D reconstruction but not on 2D MR images, even on retrospective examination. Three of the seven were radial tears and four were horizontal tears. The seven missed tears were all located in the posterior horns. CONCLUSION. Three-dimensional reconstructions are accurate for determining meniscal abnormalities and may be better than 2D imaging for evaluating the posterior horns of the menisci. Three- dimensional reconstructions may be indicated when 2D MR imaging shows no abnormality in patients in whom clinical findings strongly suggest a meniscal tear.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Vande Berg, P. Poilvache, F. Duchateau, F. E. Lecouvet, J. E. Dubuc, B. Maldague, and J. Malghem
Lesions of the Menisci of the Knee: Value of MR Imaging Criteria for Recognition of Unstable Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
B. C. Vande Berg, F. E. Lecouvet, P. Poilvache, J.-E. Dubuc, B. Bedat, B. Maldague, J.-J. Rombouts, and J. Malghem
Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography of the Knee: Accuracy for Detection of Meniscal Abnormalities and Unstable Meniscal Tears
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 851 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.