AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 353-357, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Obstructive vs nonobstructive dilatation of the renal collecting system in children: distinction with duplex sonography

RM Kessler, H Quevedo, CA Lankau, F Ramirez-Seijas, A Cepero-Akselrad, DH Altman and KM Kessler
Department of Radiology, Miami Children's Hospital, FL 33155.

OBJECTIVE. The resistive index in cortical or arcuate renal arteries of children was calculated to determine whether obstructive uropathy could be differentiated from nonobstructive dilatation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Kidneys (n = 176) were prospectively evaluated by using duplex Doppler sonography in patients 3 days to 20 years old. Obstruction was confirmed by renography with furosemide and/or by surgery. RESULTS. The normal resistive index was 0.57 +/- 0.06 and the normal difference in resistive indexes between kidneys was 0.03 +/- 0.02 (n = 15). Abnormal values indicative of ureteropelvic junction obstruction were defined as the normal mean +/- 2 SD (i.e., a resistive index of > or = 0.70 plus a difference in resistive indexes between kidneys of > or = 0.08). Patients with unilateral dilatation and obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction (n = 20) had a mean resistive index of 0.77 +/- 0.05 and a difference in resistive indexes between kidneys of 0.16 +/- 0.05 (p < .001 compared with patients with normal kidneys and p < .001 compared with patients with unilateral dilatation without obstruction). Patients with unilateral dilatation but without obstruction (n = 16) had a mean resistive index of 0.63 +/- 0.06 and a difference between kidneys of 0.06 +/- 0.04 (values within normal limits). The positive and negative predictive values of the obstruction criteria for unilateral collecting system dilatation were 95% and 100%, respectively. After successful surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 29), patients had a normal mean resistive index of 0.61 +/- 0.05 and a normal difference between kidneys of 0.03 +/- 0.03. Five patients examined both before and after surgery showed a statistically significant drop in the resistive index of the obstructed kidney (0.75 +/- 0.03 to 0.65 +/- 0.05, p < .05) after surgery and a small rise in the resistive index of the contralateral kidney (0.56 +/- 0.04 to 0.63 +/- 0.04, p < .02). CONCLUSION. The resistive index appears to be an effective parameter for the evaluation and follow-up of unilateral obstructive or nonobstructive ureteropelvic junction dilatation in children.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Unal, S. Bagcier, I. Simsir, Y. Bilgili, and S. Kara
Evaluation of Differences Between Observers and Automatic-Manual Measurements in Calculation of Doppler Parameters
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2004; 23(8): 1041 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.