AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manuli, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manuli, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 577-580, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Rectal methohexital for sedation of children during imaging procedures

MA Manuli and L Davies
Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY 14642.

OBJECTIVE. Brevital (methohexital), administered as a solution per rectum, provides safe, rapid, and effective sedation for induction of surgical anesthesia. This study was undertaken to evaluate rectal Brevital as a sedative for children undergoing imaging procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a review of patients' records, we found that, during a 1-year period, 190 children from 1 month to 14 years old were sedated for CT or MR imaging. Sedation was required for 94 CT and 96 MR imaging studies. Rectal Brevital was used in 102 patients (mean age, 25 +/- 2 months), and oral chloral hydrate was used in 88 (mean age, 28 +/- 3 months). RESULTS. Sleep was achieved in 81% of patients who received Brevital and in 80% of those who received chloral hydrate. Induction time was shorter (p = .0001) with Brevital (9 +/- 1 min) than with chloral hydrate (28 +/- 2 min). The mean duration of sleep was 46 min with Brevital and 66 min with chloral hydrate (p = .0001). Brevital provided adequate sedation in 89 (87%) of 102 imaging studies, and chloral hydrate did so in 73 (83%) of 88 studies. No cardiorespiratory complications or allergic reactions occurred with either drug. Significantly fewer patients were discharged fully awake and alert after sedation with chloral hydrate than with Brevital (p < .002). Children sedated with chloral hydrate also required a longer period of observation in the radiology department (p < .04). CONCLUSION. We conclude that rectal Brevital produces sedation of adequate duration for most imaging procedures in children. Ease of administration, wide margin of safety, rapid and pleasant induction, and short recovery time make this drug a favorable alternative to other commonly used sedatives.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
H. Sedik
Use of Intravenous Methohexital as a Sedative in Pediatric Emergency Departments
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2001; 155(6): 665 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. S. Pomeranz, C. R. Chudnofsky, T. J. Deegan, M. M. Lozon, J. C. Mitchiner, and J. E. Weber
Rectal Methohexital Sedation for Computed Tomography Imaging of Stable Pediatric Emergency Department Patients
Pediatrics, May 1, 2000; 105(5): 1110 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. Krauss and S. M. Green
Sedation and Analgesia for Procedures in Children
N. Engl. J. Med., March 30, 2000; 342(13): 938 - 945.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
D. S Beebe, P. Tran, M. Bragg, A. Stillman, C. Truwitt, and K. G. Belani
Trained nurses can provide safe and effective sedation for MRI in pediatric patients
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2000; 47(3): 205 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Lowrie, A. H. Weiss, and C. Lacombe
The Pediatric Sedation Unit: A Mechanism for Pediatric Sedation
Pediatrics, September 1, 1998; 102(3): e30 - e30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
C. Y. Poon
Pain Management and Conscious Sedation for the Pediatric Patient
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 1996; 9(1): 57 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
G. A. Hollman, M. K. Elderbrook, and B. VanDenLangenberg
Results of a Pediatric Sedation Program on Head MRI Scan Success Rates and Procedure Duration Times
Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 1995; 34(6): 300 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.