AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahmouni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vasile, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahmouni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vasile, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 1049-1052, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat- suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging

A Rahmouni, M Divine, D Mathieu, M Golli, TH Dao, N Jazaerli, MC Anglade, F Reyes and N Vasile
Department of Radiology, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.

OBJECTIVE. To determine the efficacy of fat-suppressed sequences and contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of focal spinal lesions caused by multiple myeloma, we obtained MR images in 32 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had back pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. All patients had biopsy-proved myeloma and had MR imaging at the painful level of the spine. Spin-echo T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and short TI inversion-recovery (STIR) images; dynamic ultrafast low-angle shot (turbo-FLASH) images after IV injection of a bolus of paramagnetic contrast material; and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained. We qualitatively compared the signal intensities and contrast enhancement of focal lesions with those of the surrounding vertebral bodies. RESULTS. Multiple lesions were detected in all but two of the 32 patients. On T2-weighted and STIR images, all lesions had homogeneously high signal intensity. On T1-weighted images, the lesions were visible as hypointense areas compared with surrounding bone in all except four patients, in whom the lesions were isointense or hyperintense. All tumor nodules enhanced on turbo-FLASH images obtained in the arterial phase. No additional lesions were seen on STIR or contrast-enhanced images. MR findings resulted in a change in the staging of the disease in one patient and led to prompt treatment in five patients with epidural involvement. CONCLUSION. MR imaging appears to be helpful in detecting spinal involvement in patients with multiple myeloma. The diagnosis of spinal lesions is best achieved by using either fat-suppressed or T2-weighted images. Although myeloma lesions enhanced in all patients, contrast material appears to be of no value for the detection of additional lesions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Hillengass, K. Wasser, S. Delorme, F. Kiessling, C. Zechmann, A. Benner, H.-U. Kauczor, A. D. Ho, H. Goldschmidt, and T. M. Moehler
Lumbar Bone Marrow Microcirculation Measurements from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Predictor of Event-Free Survival in Progressive Multiple Myeloma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Johnson, J. Ying, T. El Gammal, R.D. Timmerman, R.Y. Kim, and B. Littenberg
Which MR Imaging Sequences Are Necessary in Determining the Need for Radiation Therapy for Cord Compression? A Prospective Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. J. Seol, S. S. Kim, J. E. Kim, S. H. Lee, and J. Y. Won
Inflammatory Pseudotumor in the Epidural Space of the Thoracic Spine: A Case Report and Literature Review of MR Imaging Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2005; 26(10): 2667 - 2670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. C. Angtuaco, A. B. T. Fassas, R. Walker, R. Sethi, and B. Barlogie
Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Review and Diagnostic Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-L. Montazel, M. Divine, E. Lepage, H. Kobeiter, S. Breil, and A. Rahmouni
Normal Spinal Bone Marrow in Adults: Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 703 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Rahmouni, J.-L. Montazel, M. Divine, E. Lepage, K. Belhadj, P. Gaulard, M. Bouanane, M. Golli, and H. Kobeiter
Bone Marrow with Diffuse Tumor Infiltration in Patients with Lymphoproliferative Diseases: Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 710 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Castillo, A. Arbelaez, J. K. Smith, and L. L. Fisher
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Offers No Advantage over Routine Noncontrast MR Imaging in the Detection of Vertebral Metastases
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2000; 21(5): 948 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla
MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. A. Moulopoulos and M. A. Dimopoulos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Bone Marrow in Hematologic Malignancies
Blood, September 15, 1997; 90(6): 2127 - 2147.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.