AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamper, U. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kurman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamper, U. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kurman, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 1225-1228, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions

UM Hamper, S Sheth, FM Abbas, NB Rosenshein, D Aronson and RJ Kurman
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the blood flow characteristics of adnexal masses before surgical excision and to determine whether color flow Doppler sonography is useful for distinguishing benign from malignant masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-one adnexal masses were evaluated with color flow Doppler transvaginal sonography. The pulsatility index and resistive index were calculated from the waveforms generated from blood flow within the ovary. Twenty-five lesions were benign and six were malignant on pathologic examination. Benign lesions included six endometriomas, six mesothelial cysts, three serous and one mucinous cystadenoma, three mature cystic teratomas, two hemorrhagic corpus luteum cysts, one cystadenofibroma, one sclerosing stromal cell tumor, one paratubal cyst, and one ovary that had undergone torsion with infarction. The malignant lesions consisted of three papillary serous cystadenocarcinomas, one granulosatheca cell tumor, one immature teratoma, and one metastasis of colon cancer to the ovaries. RESULTS. Benign tumors and cysts had a significantly higher pulsatility index (mean, 1.93 +/- 1.02; range, 0.23-3.99) and resistive index (mean, 0.77 +/- 0.22; range, 0.2-1.0) than did malignant tumors (pulsatility index: mean, 0.77 +/- 0.33; range, 0.31-1.09; resistive index: mean, 0.5 +/- 0.17; range, 0.27-0.67). However, some overlap in individual values for benign and malignant lesions was found. CONCLUSION. Our preliminary data suggest that high pulsatility and resistive indexes indicate benign adnexal processes; however, considerable overlap in pulsatility and resistive indexes between benign and malignant lesions was noted, and further work is needed before the validity of these factors is proved.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. C. Fleischer, A. Lyshchik, H. W. Jones III, M. A. Crispens, R. F. Andreotti, P. K. Williams, and D. A. Fishman
Diagnostic Parameters to Differentiate Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Contrast-Enhanced Transvaginal Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2009; 28(10): 1273 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Barua, J. S. Abramowicz, J. M. Bahr, P. Bitterman, A. Dirks, K. A. Holub, E. Sheiner, M. J. Bradaric, S. L. Edassery, and J. L. Luborsky
Detection of Ovarian Tumors in Chicken by Sonography: A Step Toward Early Diagnosis in Humans?
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 909 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
M V Pakkal and M Balogun
Imaging of ovarian cancer
Imaging, August 1, 2006; 18(1): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Kaushik, T. T. Miller, L. N. Nazarian, and W. C. Foster
Spectral Doppler Sonography of Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Masses
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2003; 22(12): 1333 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y.-Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater, and H. K. Kang
Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1445 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Kurtz, J. V. Tsimikas, C. M. C. Tempany, U. M. Hamper, P. H. Arger, R. L. Bree, R. J. Wechsler, I. R. Francis, J. E. Kuhlman, E. S. Siegelman, et al.
Diagnosis and Staging of Ovarian Cancer: Comparative Values of Doppler and Conventional US, CT, and MR Imaging Correlated with Surgery and Histopathologic Analysis—Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.