|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 160, 1267-1271, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
MP Marks, S Napel, JE Jordan and DR Enzmann
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305- 5105.
OBJECTIVE. Spiral CT allows continuous data to be acquired rapidly, and if a correctly timed IV bolus of contrast material is given, spiral CT angiography can be performed. This study was designed to evaluate spiral CT angiography with maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions for assessing the degree of carotid artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Spiral CT angiography (of 28 carotid bifurcations in 14 patients) was compared in a blinded fashion with conventional angiography (of 28 bifurcations) and with two-dimensional time-of- flight MR angiography (of 12 bifurcations) to assess degree of stenosis. A nonblinded comparison of the contour of the lumen at the site of stenosis was then made between conventional angiography, spiral CT angiography, and MR angiography. The degree of stenosis was measured in each internal carotid artery and categorized as mild (< 30%), moderate (30-69%), or severe (70-99%) stenosis or as occlusion. Maximum- intensity-projection images were used for the evaluations; however, if calcification was circumferential and the lumen of the carotid artery could not be analyzed in the area of the calcification, the axial source images were used. RESULTS. The results of CT angiography and conventional angiography agreed overall in 25 (89%) of 28 cases (r = .921, p = .05, Spearman rank correlation). The presence of severe stenosis or occlusion was correctly identified in seven of seven cases. In the moderate and mild stenosis categories, 18 (86%) of 21 were correctly identified (r = .802, p = .122). Three internal carotid arteries (11%) had circumferential calcification that necessitated evaluation of the axial source images, and the measurements obtained from the axial images agreed well with angiographic findings. MR angiography correlated well with the various categories of stenosis. However, when we compared MR angiography directly with CT angiography and conventional angiography, we found that the degree of stenosis was overestimated when MR angiography was used. CONCLUSION. Our results show that spiral CT angiography shows normal and abnormal carotid anatomy well when compared with conventional angiography. The short examination time and clear depiction of arterial caliber in areas of stenosis are significant advantages of spiral CT angiography compared with MR angiography.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Saba and G. Mallarini MDCTA of Carotid Plaque Degree of Stenosis: Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W41 - W46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Singh, D. V. Sahani, C. R. Kagay, S. P. Kalva, M. C. Joshi, N. Elias, and T. Kawai Semiautomated MIP Images Created Directly on 16-Section Multidetector CT Console for Evaluation of Living Renal Donors Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 583 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Nandalur, E. Baskurt, K. D. Hagspiel, M. Finch, C. D. Phillips, S. R. Bollampally, and C. M. Kramer Carotid Artery Calcification on CT May Independently Predict Stroke Risk Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chicoskie and R. Tello Gadolinium-Enhanced MDCT Angiography of the Abdomen: Feasibility and Limitations Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1821 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J.W. Koelemay, P. J. Nederkoorn, J. B. Reitsma, and C. B. Majoie Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2306 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-J. Chen, T.-H. Lee, H.-L. Hsu, Y.-C. Tseng, S.-K. Lin, L.-J. Wang, and Y.-C. Wong Multi-Slice CT Angiography in Diagnosing Total Versus Near Occlusions of the Internal Carotid Artery: Comparison With Catheter Angiography Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 83 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Carr, J. Ma, V. Desphande, S. Pereles, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn High-Resolution Breath-Hold Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Entire Carotid Circulation Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Nagano, K. Maruoka, S. Uemura, and M. Takahashi Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Anderson, R. Ashforth, D. E. Steinke, R. Ferdinandy, and J. M. Findlay CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2168 - 2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, J. Y. Gauvrit, and J. P. Pruvo Usefulness of CT Angiography with Volume Rendering After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 820 - 822. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ochi, K. Shimizu, Y. Yasuhara, T. Shigesawa, T. Mochizuki, and J. Ikezoe Curved Planar Reformatted CT Angiography: Usefulness for the Evaluation of Aneurysms at the Carotid Siphon AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 1999; 20(6): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Marcus, V. J. Ladam-Marcus, J.-L. Bigot, C. Clement, B. Baehrel, and B. P. Menanteau Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Evaluation at CT Angiography with the Volume-rendering Technique Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 775 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, C. Lucas, J.-F. Benhaim, T. S. Michel, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: CT Angiography with Volume Rendering Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, C. Ferrari, M. Roberti, M. Alerci, P. L. Pedrazzi, and A. Gallino Spiral Computed Tomography : A Novel Diagnostic Approach for Investigation of the Extracranial Cerebral Arteries and Its Complementary Role in Duplex Ultrasonography Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 984 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gorich, A.J. Aschoff, K.-H. Orend, V. Mickley, R. Sokiranski, H.-J. Brambs, N. Rilinger, and S. C. Kramer Diagnostic Value of Spiral-CT Angiography in Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography Before and After Peripheral Vascular Intervention Angiology, August 1, 1998; 49(8): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, J. P. Pruvo, and D. Leys Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis Stroke, September 1, 1995; 26(9): 1577 - 1581. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, Y. Murata, M. Takahashi, K. Suginohara, and S. Uemura Maximum Stenosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery: Effect of Luminal Morphology on Stenosis Measurement by Using CT Angiography and Conventional DSA Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 802 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |