AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wootton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wootton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 409-416, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Value of brominated fluorocarbons for the radiographic diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction: comparison with other contrast agents in rats

SL Wootton, BD Coley, SV Hilton, DK Edwards 3d, JR Amberg and RF Mattrey
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, Medical Center 92103.

OBJECTIVE. The disadvantages of water-soluble gastrointestinal contrast agents include high osmolality, contrast dilution, and severe toxicity if aspirated. Perfluorocarbons are nontoxic in the lung and peritoneal cavity. Because perfluorocarbons are immiscible with water, they have no osmotic effect and cannot be diluted. Because these properties offer theoretical advantages over traditional gastrointestinal contrast agents, we compared two perfluorocarbons with barium and ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast material in a rat model of small-bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twelve groups of six rats each had ligation of the terminal ileum (obstruction model) or of the terminal ileum and mesenteric artery (obstruction with ischemia model). Each rat received 3 ml of barium, meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iohexol, neat perfluorooctyl bromide, neat perfluorohexyl bromide, or saline (control animals). Contrast media were given at the recommended concentrations, and their progression was evaluated on serial radiographs by an observer who was not aware of the model or the contrast medium given. When one contrast material reached the point of obstruction, all rats in the group were sacrificed and a final radiograph was obtained. Three radiologists, who were not aware of the contrast medium given, on two separate occasions independently reviewed the radiographs and ranked the contrast agents for their relative radiopacity, mucosal definition, speed of transit, gastric retention, and bowel distension. RESULTS. When data from both models were combined, perfluorocarbons were judged on the final image to be the most radiodense, to provide the sharpest mucosal detail, to have the least gastric retention, and to have faster progression than barium. Whereas meglumine sodium diatrizoate and iohexol reached the point of obstruction more rapidly than the perfluorocarbons and barium, they had the greatest gastric retention, caused the most bowel distension, and were the least radiopaque. CONCLUSION. Our results show that the radiopaque perfluorocarbons are suitable as gastrointestinal contrast agents and have favorable radiographic characteristics in this animal model. When these results are combined with the low-toxicity profile of perflubron, clinical evaluation of this agent for the radiographic assessment of bowel obstruction is warranted.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.