AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Feig, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Feig, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 755-760, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a critical review

DB Kopans and SA Feig
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Public health planners around the world had been awaiting the preliminary results of the randomized, controlled trial of breast cancer screening performed by the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) during the 1980s. It had been hoped that this large study would answer, with statistical validity, many of the questions concerning breast cancer screening that had not been answered satisfactorily by previous studies. Among the major unresolved issues is the desire to establish "absolute" proof that mammographic screening can benefit women who are between 40 and 49 years old.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. B. Kopans
Screening Mammography for Women Age 40 to 49 Years
Ann Intern Med, November 20, 2007; 147(10): 740 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds
Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Kopans
Bias in the Medical Journals: A Commentary
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins
On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 43 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans, B. Monsees, and S. A. Feig
Screening for "Cancer": When is it Valid?--Lessons from the Mammography Experience
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 319 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Kopans
The Most Recent Breast Cancer Screening Controversy About Whether Mammographic Screening Benefits Women at Any Age: Nonsense and Nonscience
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 21 - 26.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. P. Jackson
Screening Mammography: Controversies and Headlines
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 323 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Feig
Image Quality of Screening Mammography: Effect on Clinical Outcome
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 805 - 807.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C J M de Wolf, G Q. della Rovere, R. Warren, A B Miller, and C J Baines
Detection of breast cancer
BMJ, March 31, 2001; 322(7289): 792a - 792.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Feig
Age-related Accuracy of Screening Mammography: How Should It Be Measured?
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 633 - 640.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. B. Kopans, E. Halpern, and D. A. Berry
Re: Benefits and Risks of Screening Mammography for Women in Their Forties: a Statistical Appraisal • RESPONSE
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 17, 1999; 91(4): 382 - 384.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. W. Bassett, V. P. Jackson, G. Cardenosa, D. B. Kopans, C. J. D'Orsi, M. N. Linver, P. J. Dempsey, E. B. Mendelson, D. D. Dershaw, B. Monsees, et al.
Risk of Risk-Based Mammography Screening, Ages 40 to 49
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 730 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans
The Breast Cancer Screening Controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40–49
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 4 - 9.
[Full Text]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. K. Salazar and C. de Moor
An Evaluation of Mammography Beliefs Using a Decision Model
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 1995; 22(1): 110 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. B. Kopans
The Accuracy of Mammographic Interpretation
N. Engl. J. Med., December 1, 1994; 331(22): 1521 - 1522.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.