AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schleich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Almange, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schleich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Almange, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 799-803, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Short-term follow-up of inferior vena caval filters: comparison of imaging techniques

JM Schleich, M Laurent, A Le Helloco, B Langella, A Ramee and C Almange
Department of Cardiology B, University Hospital, Rennes, France.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the advantages and limitations of various imaging techniques in identifying problems associated with percutaneous placement of filters in the inferior vena cava. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred four vena caval filters (65 Filcard, 39 Cardial) were placed in 100 patients (four patients received two filters). Venacavograms, duplex sonograms of the abdomen, abdominal radiographs, perfusion scans of the lung, and impedance plethysmograms were obtained in all patients within 1-2 days and 3 months after filter placement. CT scans of the filter were obtained in 55 patients. RESULTS. In five patients, thrombosis of the inferior vena cava, with retraction of the filter struts in four patients, was noted on venacavograms, CT scans, duplex sonograms, and impedance plethysmograms. Perforation of the inferior vena cava was noted in 36 patients after comparison of findings on venacavograms and CT scans, with an increase in the filter span in 29 patients (apparent on duplex sonograms in only two patients). Four filter tiltings (> 30 degrees) and 25 migrations (> 5 mm) were noted on abdominal radiographs. Trapped thrombi in the filter were shown on venacavograms in nine cases, but on duplex sonograms and unenhanced CT scans in only two cases. CONCLUSION. Our study shows that the major complications of inferior vena caval filters can be detected by noninvasive examinations. Only venacavograms consistently show small trapped thrombi that do not extend above the filter, but the importance of such thrombi is unknown.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Girard, J.-B. Stern, and F. Parent
Medical Literature and Vena Cava Filters* : So Far So Weak
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 963 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.