AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frank, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frank, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, F. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 881-884, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Quality assessment in radiology: value of a portable bar-code scanner integrated with a computer workstation

MS Frank, T Gillespy and FA Mann
Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle 98104.

Radiographs are typically processed by several employees of a radiology department before being interpreted by a radiologist. A technologist acquires and labels the radiograph(s), and file room employees match the radiograph(s) with prior examinations and prepare them for interpretation by the radiologist. Every radiologist has encountered radiologic examinations in which the image quality, presentation, or associated clinical or technical information is suboptimal. In small departments, the process of immediately tracking the problem to its source and correcting it might be straightforward, albeit an annoying interruption to the radiologist's focus on clinical care. However, in larger departments, trends of human error or machine malfunction may be overlooked or untraceable because no effective method exists to track the quality of images and associated information. A feedback loop from radiologists to the department's ancillary personnel can result in a cycle of continuous quality improvement that enhances the quality of radiographic examinations and also decreases waste. To achieve this, we designed and implemented a computerized process that involves a portable bar-code scanner, a personal computer workstation, and our existing radiology information system.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.