AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Longmaid, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Longmaid, H. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 989-994, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography vs duplex Doppler sonography

JP Finn, RA Kane, RR Edelman, RL Jenkins, WD Lewis, M Muller and HE Longmaid
Department of Radiology, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.

OBJECTIVE. To determine the relative performances of MR angiography and duplex Doppler sonography in the evaluation of the portal venous system in patients with portal hypertension, we compared two-dimensional time- of-flight MR angiography and duplex Doppler sonography in 60 sequential patients with cirrhosis. All 60 subsequently underwent liver transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR imaging and duplex Doppler sonography were performed on the same day, and in all patients the imaging findings were validated at surgical exploration. Five transplantation candidates had surgical portosystemic shunts in situ at the time of imaging. MR images were acquired during breath-holding, and flow in the portal vein was evaluated with presaturation bolus-tracking MR imaging. Sonography included color Doppler and pulsed gated Doppler images of the portal vein. MR angiograms and sonograms were analyzed independently and prospectively for patency of the portal vein, patency of surgical shunts, and grade and distribution of portosystemic collateral vessels. Scores on both imaging techniques were compared by using regression analysis. RESULTS. MR angiograms showed all five cases of portal vein occlusion and all 55 cases of patent portal veins. Sonograms showed three of five cases of portal vein occlusion and 52 of 55 cases of patent portal veins. The techniques concurred in assessing flow direction in 54 (90%) of 60 patients, and both procedures enabled detection of occlusive portal vein thrombus in one patient. We found a significant correlation (p < .001) between the grades of gastric varices detected with MR angiography and surgery but no significant correlation between the grades seen on sonography and found at surgery. Shunt patency in four of five patients and shunt occlusion in one were correctly assessed on MR angiograms, whereas three of these shunts were not visible on sonograms. CONCLUSION. Our results show that MR angiography is more reliable than duplex Doppler sonography for evaluating the portal venous system in patients with portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
K. M. Stamou, K. G. Toutouzas, P. B. Kekis, S. Nakos, A. Gafou, A. Manouras, E. Krespis, S. Katsaragakis, and J. Bramis
Prospective Study of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Postsplenectomy Thrombosis of the Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Veins
Arch Surg, July 1, 2006; 141(7): 663 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Rossi, L. Rosa, V. Ravetta, A. Cascina, P. Quaretti, A. Azzaretti, P. Scagnelli, C. Tinelli, P. Dionigi, and F. Calliada
Contrast-enhanced versus conventional and color Doppler sonography for the detection of thrombosis of the portal and hepatic venous systems.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 763 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. J. Bryce, B. M. Yeh, A. Qayyum, P. Pacharn, N. M. Bass, Y. Lu, and F. V. Coakley
CT Signs of Hepatofugal Portal Venous Flow in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1629 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Kreft, H. Strunk, S. Flacke, M. Wolff, R. Conrad, J. Gieseke, D. Pauleit, R. Bachmann, A. Hirner, and H. H. Schild
Detection of Thrombosis in the Portal Venous System: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 86 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Ernst, V. Asnar, G. Sergent, E. Lederman, L. Nicol, J.-C. Paris, and C. L'Hermine
Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography and Conventional Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Okumura, Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, T. Ishimori, Y. Amoh, K. Oda, and Y. Dodo
Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Portography
RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 973 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Kopka, J. Rodenwaldt, R. Vosshenrich, U. Fischer, B. Renner, T. Lorf, J. Graessner, B. Ringe, and E. Grabbe
Hepatic Blood Supply: Comparison of Optimized Dual Phase Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 51 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.