AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blatter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blatter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 161, 1269-1277, Copyright © 1993 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Cervical carotid MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition: comparison with conventional angiography

DD Blatter, AL Bahr, DL Parker, RO Robison, JA Kimball, DM Perry and S Horn
Department of Radiology, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84143.

OBJECTIVE. Multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition (MOTSA) is a hybrid time-of-flight MR angiography technique that combines the advantages of two- and three-dimensional methods. A venetian blind-like artifact, resulting from variations in signal intensity at slab boundaries, is a potentially significant disadvantage. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of MOTSA MR angiography for the measurement of stenosis and to evaluate the effectiveness of modifications to reduce the venetian blind artifact. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing conventional and MR angiography of the carotid arteries for suspected atherosclerotic disease were studied. Methods established in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) were used to measure stenosis. Measurements from the conventional angiograms were compared with those from the MR angiograms. Modifications of the MR angiographic technique that were instituted after the initial 26 patients to reduce the venetian blind artifact included new acquisition parameters and the use of a postprocessing algorithm. RESULTS. After modification, highly significant improvements in Spearman ranked correlation coefficients were observed for MR angiography interobserver comparison (.573 to .974, p < .001) and comparison of conventional and MR angiography (.774 to .949, p < .001). A corresponding reduction was observed in the standard deviation of the difference measurement for percent stenosis for both interobserver (34.5% to 11.7%, p < .001) and intertechnique (22.6% to 12.6%, p < .001) comparisons. In the postmodification group, the interobserver correlation coefficients for conventional and MR angiography were not significantly different (.969 vs .974). The areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves used to predict surgically significant disease for the premodification and postmodification groups were 0.79 and 0.98, respectively, for observer A and 0.85 and 0.95, respectively, for observer B. CONCLUSION. Improved acquisition parameters and postprocessing significantly reduce the severity of the venetian blind artifact and increase the accuracy of MOTSA MR angiography in the measurement of percent stenosis. With these improvements, MOTSA MR angiography shows promise for noninvasive evaluation of stenosis of the carotid arteries.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. F. Layton, J. Huston 3rd, H. J. Cloft, T. J. Kaufmann, K. N. Krecke, and D. F. Kallmes
Specificity of MR Angiography as a Confirmatory Test for Carotid Artery Stenosis: Is It Valid?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1114 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. S. Hatsukami, R. Ross, N. L. Polissar, and C. Yuan
Visualization of Fibrous Cap Thickness and Rupture in Human Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque In Vivo With High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Circulation, August 29, 2000; 102(9): 959 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. R. Melhem, S. D. Caruthers, S. G. Faddoul, R. Tello, and H. Jara
Use of Three-dimensional MR Angiography for Tracking a Contrast Bolus in the Carotid Artery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 1999; 20(2): 263 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Young, W. S. Moore, J. T. Robertson, J. F. Toole, C. B. Ernst, S. N. Cohen, J. P. Broderick, R. J. Dempsey, and J. D. Hosking
An Analysis of Perioperative Surgical Mortality and Morbidity in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study
Stroke, December 1, 1996; 27(12): 2216 - 2224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.