AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Gils, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pauwels, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Gils, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pauwels, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 147-153, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement

AP van Gils, R van den Berg, TH Falke, JL Bloem, HJ Prins, EH Dillon, AG van der Mey and EK Pauwels
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. Contrast enhancement with gadopentetate dimeglumine has been advocated to increase the efficacy of MR imaging for paragangliomas of the head and neck. However, contrast media are expensive, time- consuming to use, and involve minimal but not negligible risks. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of contrast material is warranted in patients undergoing MR imaging for the diagnosis of paragangliomas of the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Unenhanced MR images were compared with images obtained after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in 23 healthy subjects and 37 patients who had a total of 71 tumors. Three combinations of sequences were reviewed independently and in a random order by four observers who had no clinical information. Combination A comprised enhanced and unenhanced T1-weighted sequences, combination B comprised unenhanced T1- and T2- weighted sequences, and combination C was a combination of all sequences. A four-point scale of certainty was used. CT, scintigraphic, angiographic, and surgicopathologic findings were used as the standard of reference. Results were subjected to alternative free-response receiver-operating-characteristic (AFROC) scoring and statistical analysis. RESULTS. The mean areas under the AFROC curve for combinations A, B, and C were 0.761, 0.856, and 0.827, respectively. Mean sensitivity/specificity values after dichotomizing the scoring results were 0.73/0.94, 0.79/0.95, and 0.78/0.94 for combinations A, B, and C, respectively. The performance of combinations B and C did not differ markedly, but both combinations were significantly better than combination A. In a relatively large percentage (36%) of small postoperative tumor residues not detected on unenhanced images, however, gadopentetate dimeglumine allowed detection. CONCLUSION. The results of this study indicate that, in general, the use of gadopentetate dimeglumine is not necessary for the detection of head and neck paragangliomas. The addition of contrast-enhanced imaging does not increase the sensitivity or specificity compared with imaging without enhancement. Only when searching for small postoperative tumor residues is the addition of gadopentetate dimeglumine warranted.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. van den Berg, B. M. Verbist, B. J. A. Mertens, A. G. L. van der Mey, and M. A. van Buchem
Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 863 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Graf, U. Simon, F. Eickmeyer, and V. Fiedler
IK Versus 2K Monitor: A Clinical Alternative Free-Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Study of Observer Performance Using Pulmonary Nodules
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1067 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. van den Berg, M. N.J.M. Wasser, A. P.G. van Gils, A. G.L. van der Mey, J. Hermans, and M. A. van Buchem
Vascularization of Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 162 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.