AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, D.
Right arrow Articles by Marinelli, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, D.
Right arrow Articles by Marinelli, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 179-183, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

The value of duplex sonography after peripheral artery angioplasty in predicting subacute restenosis

D Sacks, ML Robinson, TA Summers and DL Marinelli
Department of Radiology, Reading Hospital and Medical Center, PA 19603.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal findings on duplex sonographic examination after peripheral artery angioplasty correlate with the subsequent recurrence of a stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We used duplex sonography to examine 35 stenoses in 23 patients within 48 hr after the patients had angioplasty to treat these stenoses. Patients were followed up for 3 years by using one or more of the following: assessment of signs and symptoms, monitoring of peripheral pulses, pulse volume recordings, and angiography. Life tables were constructed to compare long-term patency with the presence of abnormal findings seen on duplex sonograms. Abnormal findings at the dilated segment included a blood-flow velocity greater than 120 cm/sec or a residual elevated velocity ratio greater than 1.4 or 2.0 immediately after angioplasty. RESULTS. Twelve (34%) of 35 angioplasty sites showed recurrent stenosis before 36 months. Patency at 24 months was calculated for velocities less than 120 cm/sec vs velocities of 120 cm/sec or greater (41% vs 68%), for velocity ratios less than 1.4 vs ratios of 1.4 or greater (63% vs 57%), and for velocity ratios less than 2.0 vs ratios of 2.0 or greater (54% vs 74%). We found no significant difference in patency between those patients with normal findings and those with abnormal findings on duplex sonographic examination after angioplasty. CONCLUSION. Abnormal findings on duplex sonograms obtained immediately after peripheral angioplasty cannot be used to predict subacute restenosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.