|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 195-199, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
AD Elster, KM Link and JJ Carr
Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1022.
The article by Boutin et al. [1] in this issue of the AJR documents a surprinsingly great variation in the MR screening procedures used at different academic centers throughout the United States. Although considerable literature now exists concerning the MR imaging of patients with ferromagnetic implants, devices, and foreign bodies [2- 4], no uniform screening protocol to identify such patients has yet been adopted. The Safety Committee of the Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMRI) has recommended that "each imaging site should develop a standardized policy for screening patients with suspected metallic foreign bodies" [5]. To date, however, the SMRI has neither proposed nor endorsed a specific screening protocol for general use.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Chaljub, L. A. Kramer, R. F. Johnson III, R. F. Johnson Jr., H. Singh, and W. N. Crow Projectile Cylinder Accidents Resulting from the Presence of Ferromagnetic Nitrous Oxide or Oxygen Tanks in the MR Suite Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 27 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Seidenwurm, C. H. McDonnell III, N. Raghavan, and J. Breslau Cost Utility Analysis of Radiographic Screening for an Orbital Foreign Body before MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2000; 21(2): 426 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |