American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 43-47, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Efficacy of CT in distinguishing small-bowel obstruction from other causes of small-bowel dilatation

GS Gazelle, MA Goldberg, J Wittenberg, EF Halpern, L Pinkney and PR Mueller
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

OBJECTIVE. Dilatation of the small bowel is a common finding on plain abdominal radiographs. In such cases, it is often difficult to determine if the cause of the dilatation is small-bowel obstruction, paralytic ileus, or another intraabdominal disorder. Accordingly, we studied the efficacy of CT in making this distinction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The medical records of 75 patients with small-bowel dilatation seen on CT scans (more than three segments > 2.5 cm in diameter) were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups (obstruction [27 patients], other surgical diagnosis [16 patients], and no surgery [32 patients]) on the basis of clinical course, findings at surgery, or both. CT scans were retrospectively evaluated by two gastrointestinal radiologists who did not know the results of the chart review. They evaluated the images with regard to the following specific criteria for obstruction: presence/continuity of duodenal, small-bowel, and colonic dilatation; presence of air-fluid levels; amount of intestinal fluid; presence of prestenotic dilatation; presence of transition zone; and cause of obstruction. In addition, each radiologist gave an overall impression regarding the presence or absence of obstruction (criteria not specified to the observers) and its site, or other cause of bowel dilatation. The CT interpretations of each of the radiologists were compared with the patients' subsequent clinical course. RESULTS. Observer A was correct in 89%, 88%, and 72% of cases in the obstruction, other surgical diagnosis, and no surgery groups, respectively. Observer B was correct in 78%, 81%, and 69% of cases in the obstruction, other surgical diagnosis, and no surgery groups, respectively. Observer agreement regarding the proposed criteria for obstruction ranged from 65% to 91%. For both observers, only the presence of continuous small-bowel dilatation, prestenotic dilatation, and a transition zone correlated significantly with the presence of small-bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION. CT can be a useful test for evaluating small-bowel dilatation and can aid both the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction and its differentiation from other conditions resulting in small-bowel dilatation.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. M. Thompson, R. K. Kilani, B. B. Smith, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, D. M. Delong, and E. K. Paulson Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W233 - W238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E M Anderson Imaging of acute small bowel obstruction Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Jaffe, L. C. Martin, J. Thomas, A. R. Adamson, D. M. DeLong, and E. K. Paulson Small-Bowel Obstruction: Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels at 16-Section Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, S. H. Kim, J. Y. Jeong, S. K. An, C. J. Han, K.-R. Son, K. H. Lee, J. M. Lee, and B. I. Choi Small-Bowel Obstruction in a Phantom Model of ex Vivo Porcine Intestine: Comparison of PACS Stack and Tile Modes for CT Interpretation Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 867 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Fuchsjager The Small-Bowel Feces Sign Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 378 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Jabra, J. Eng, C. G. Zaleski, G. E. Abdenour Jr., H. V. Vuong, U. O. Aideyan, and E. K. Fishman CT of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Children: Sensitivity and Specificity Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 431 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Furukawa, M. Yamasaki, K. Furuichi, K. Yokoyama, T. Nagata, M. Takahashi, K. Murata, and T. Sakamoto Helical CT in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Obstruction RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 341 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. T. Maglinte, F. M. Kelvin, M. G. Rowe, G. N. Bender, and D. M. Rouch Small-Bowel Obstruction: Optimizing Radiologic Investigation and Nonsurgical Management Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 39 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. C. Lappas, B. L. Reyes, and D. D. T. Maglinte Abdominal Radiography Findings in Small-Bowel Obstruction: Relevance to Triage for Additional Diagnostic Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. W. Umschaden, D. Szolar, J. Gasser, M. Umschaden, and H. Haselbach Small-Bowel Disease: Comparison of MR Enteroclysis Images with Conventional Enteroclysis and Surgical Findings Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 717 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. Gore, F. H. Miller, F. S. Pereles, V. Yaghmai, and J. W. Berlin Helical CT in the Evaluation of the Acute Abdomen Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 901 - 913. [Full Text] [PDF]