American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 271-278, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules

F Kelcz, FE Zink, WW Peppler, DG Kruger, DL Ergun and CA Mistretta
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792-3252.

OBJECTIVE. We evaluated a single-exposure, phosphor-plate, dual-energy imaging device that produces, in addition to conventional chest radiographs, both tissue- and bone-selective images. Our purpose was to determine whether dual-energy radiography was more accurate than routine chest radiography for detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two hundred patients undergoing chest CT were asked to volunteer to have dual-energy and conventional chest radiographs obtained immediately before or after their CT scan. Radiographs from a subset of 50 of these patients with 116 CT-detected nodules and 10 patients with normal findings on CT scans of the chest were presented to the observers for the nodule detection study. Similarly, radiographs from a subset of 29 patients with 20 calcified and 20 uncalcified nodules were presented to five observers to determine nodule calcification. Dual-energy images were produced by filtering the X-ray tube output with a gadolinium sheet while using a multiple phosphor plate receptor. A dual-energy triad of images consisting of a conventional image, a tissue-selective image, and a bone-selective image were produced. The conventional chest radiographs and dual-energy image sets were presented to observers in random order. Data from a free response receiver operating curve and a receiver operating curve were generated for nodule detection and characterization, respectively. RESULTS. By using the dual-energy images, all five observers improved their ability to diagnose pulmonary nodules (p = .0005) and to characterize nodules as calcified (p = .005). CONCLUSION. By eliminating rib shadows with tissue-selective images and enhancing calcified structures with bone-selective images, dual-energy chest radiography improved the ability of all observers, regardless of expertise, to detect and characterize pulmonary nodules.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. P. McAdams, E. Samei, J. Dobbins III, G. D. Tourassi, and C. E. Ravin Recent Advances in Chest Radiography Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 663 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. T. Winer-Muram The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 34 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Kuhlman, J. Collins, G. N. Brooks, D. R. Yandow, and L. S. Broderick Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography: What to Look for beyond Calcified Nodules RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 79 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Fischbach, T. Freund, R. Rottgen, U. Engert, R. Felix, and J. Ricke Dual-Energy Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Digital Detector: Revealing Calcified Chest Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1519 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, E. Peterson, and W. R. Eyler Subtle Lung Nodules: Influence of Local Anatomic Variations on Detection Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 76 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]