AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Becker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 343-347, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Blunt splenic trauma in adults: can CT findings be used to determine the need for surgery?

CD Becker, P Spring, A Glattli and W Schweizer
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Berne, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE. The role of CT grading of blunt splenic injuries is still controversial. We studied the CT scans of adult patients with proved blunt splenic injuries to determine if the findings accurately reflect the extent of the injury. We were specifically interested in establishing if CT findings can be used to determine whether patients require surgery or can be managed conservatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The CT scans of 45 patients with blunt splenic injuries were analyzed retrospectively, and the CT findings were correlated with the need for surgery. We used (1) a CT scale (I-V) for splenic parenchymal injuries that also allowed a comparison with the surgical findings in patients who underwent laparotomy, and (2) a CT-based score (1-6) that referred to both the extent of parenchymal injuries and the degree of hemoperitoneum. Early laparotomy was done in nine patients. Conservative treatment was attempted in 36 patients and was successful in 31; five patients needed delayed laparotomy after attempted conservative treatment. RESULTS. According to the CT scale (I-V), 25 patients had injuries of grade I or II; 20 patients were successfully treated conservatively, whereas five patients needed delayed surgery. Nineteen patients had injuries of grade III, IV, or V; eight patients underwent early laparotomy, and 11 patients were successfully treated conservatively. CT findings were false-negative in one patient who underwent early surgery for diaphragmatic rupture. A comparison of the CT findings with the intraoperative findings according to the CT scale (I-V) revealed identical parenchymal injury grades in four cases, whereas the injuries were underestimated on CT scans in four patients and overestimated on CT scans in six patients. The CT-based score (1-6) was applied to 41 patients; four patients who had peritoneal lavage before CT were excluded. Twelve patients had scores below 2.5; 10 patients were successfully treated conservatively, and two patients needed delayed surgery. Twenty-nine patients had scores of 2.5 or higher; six patients underwent early laparotomy, 20 patients were successfully treated conservatively, and three patients needed delayed surgery. Patients who required delayed surgery had a mean score of 3.0 (SD, +/- 1.0), which was similar to those who did not require surgery (3.1 +/- 1.5; p = .45). CONCLUSION. Our results show that CT findings cannot be used to determine reliably which patients require surgery and which patients can be treated conservatively. Even patients with splenic parenchymal injuries of CT grade III, IV, and V and with CT- based scores of 2.5 or higher can be successfully treated conservatively if the clinical situation is appropriate, whereas delayed splenic rupture can still develop in patients with low CT grades or scores. The choice between operative and nonoperative management of splenic trauma should be mainly based on clinical findings rather than CT findings.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Marmery, K. Shanmuganathan, M. T. Alexander, and S. E. Mirvis
Optimization of Selection for Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Injury: Comparison of MDCT Grading Systems
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1421 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. Anderson, J. C. Varghese, B. C. Lucey, P. A. Burke, E. F. Hirsch, and J. A. Soto
Blunt Splenic Trauma: Delayed-Phase CT for Differentiation of Active Hemorrhage from Contained Vascular Injury in Patients
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Bessoud, A. Denys, J.-M. Calmes, D. Madoff, S. Qanadli, P. Schnyder, and F. Doenz
Nonoperative management of traumatic splenic injuries: is there a role for proximal splenic artery embolization?
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 779 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P.-A. Poletti, A. Platon, C. D. Becker, G. Mentha, B. Vermeulen, L. H. Buhler, and F. Terrier
Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Does the Use of a Second-Generation Sonographic Contrast Agent Help to Detect Solid Organ Injuries?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1293 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. C. Velmahos, K. G. Toutouzas, R. Radin, L. Chan, and D. Demetriades
Nonoperative Treatment of Blunt Injury to Solid Abdominal Organs: A Prospective Study
Arch Surg, August 1, 2003; 138(8): 844 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. C. Yao, R. B. Jeffrey Jr., S. E. Mirvis, A. Weekes, M. P. Federle, C. Kim, M. J. Lane, P. Prabhakar, and P. W. Ralls
Using Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT to Visualize Arterial Extravasation After Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Incidence and Organ Distribution
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 17 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Shanmuganathan, S. E. Mirvis, R. Boyd-Kranis, T. Takada, and T. M. Scalea
Nonsurgical Management of Blunt Splenic Injury: Use of CT Criteria to Select Patients for Splenic Arteriography and Potential Endovascular Therapy
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. C. Velmahos, L. S. Chan, E. Kamel, J. A. Murray, N. Yassa, D. Kahaku, T. V. Berne, and D. Demetriades
Nonoperative Management of Splenic Injuries: Have We Gone Too Far?
Arch Surg, June 1, 2000; 135(6): 674 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Shanmuganathan, S. E. Mirvis, C. D. Sherbourne, W. C. Chiu, and A. Rodriguez
Hemoperitoneum as the Sole Indicator of Abdominal Visceral Injuries: A Potential Limitation of Screening Abdominal US for Trauma
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 423 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. S. Cocanour, F. A. Moore, D. N. Ware, R. G. Marvin, J. M. Clark, and J. H. Duke
Delayed Complications of Nonoperative Management of Blunt Adult Splenic Trauma
Arch Surg, June 1, 1998; 133(6): 619 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.