AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margolin, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margolin, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 585-591, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective

PC Stomper and FR Margolin
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.

Ductal carcinoma in situ represents a heterogeneous group of lesions now most commonly discovered by mammography. The biological behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ ranges from indolent, essentially benign lesions to obligate precursors of invasive carcinoma. This article reviews the natural history of this disorder, its mammographic and pathologic features, and current considerations in patient management, including the role of mammography. The results of recent clinical trials are summarized.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani, P. Panizza, C. Del Frate, F. Soldano, M. Isola, F. Sardanelli, G. M. Giuseppetti, G. Simonetti, V. Lattanzio, et al.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1723 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. S. Giess, D. M. Keating, M. P. Osborne, and R. Rosenblatt
Local Tumor Recurrence following Breast-Conservation Therapy: Correlation of Histopathologic Findings with Detection Method and Mammographic Findings
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
A. T. Harris
Case 41: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 770 - 773.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.