AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gisvold, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gisvold, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 815-820, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques

JJ Gisvold, JR Goellner, CS Grant, JH Donohue, MW Sykes, PR Karsell, SL Coffey and SH Jung
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

OBJECTIVE. The major objectives of this prospective study were to compare pathologic findings from stereotaxic core and excisional biopsies performed on patients with impalpable breast lesions and to compare the initial mammographic impression with the final histologic diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. All patients referred for preoperative localization of impalpable breast lesions between October 29, 1991, and January 15, 1993, were eligible for the study. If the patient and the lesion, on the basis of mammography, were considered suitable for core biopsy, the patient was asked to participate. Four hundred forty-five excisional biopsies were performed. One hundred sixty lesions were evaluated by core biopsy; for 104 of these lesions, five or more core samples were removed. Core biopsies were done with 14-gauge biopsy needles and were followed by a localization procedure. The pathologic features of core and excisional specimens were compared. RESULTS. Biopsy results were compared for 93 (58%) benign and 67 (42%) malignant lesions. Of 104 lesions evaluated with at least five core specimens, 56 (54%) were benign and 48 (46%) were malignant. Results of core biopsy corresponded to those of excisional biopsy for 96% of benign lesions, 83% of malignant lesions, and 90% overall; sensitivity of core biopsy for malignant lesions was 85%. Of 56 lesions for which fewer than five core specimens were obtained, 37 (66%) were benign and 19 (34%) were malignant. Results of core biopsy corresponded to those of excisional biopsy for 81% of benign lesions, 79% of malignant lesions, and 80% overall; sensitivity of core biopsy for malignant lesions was 84%. Specificity of core biopsy for the entire series of benign lesions was 100%. CONCLUSION. For mammographic lesions that are believed to be not malignant or not very likely malignant, stereotaxic core biopsy decreases the need for excisional biopsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Somerville, P. J. Seifert, S. V. Destounis, P. F. Murphy, and W. Young
Anticoagulation and Bleeding Risk After Core Needle Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1194 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. C. Riedl, G. Pfarl, M. Memarsadeghi, T. Wagner, F. Fitzal, M. Rudas, and T. H. Helbich
Lesion Miss Rates and False-Negative Rates for 1115 Consecutive Cases of Stereotactically Guided Needle-localized Open Breast Biopsy with Long-term Follow-up
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 847 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
A. K. Koskela, M. Sudah, M. H. Berg, V. J. Karja, P. K. Mustonen, V. Kataja, and R. S. Vanninen
Add-on Device for Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: How Many Biopsy Specimens Are Needed for a Reliable Diagnosis?
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 801 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Ghosh, L. J. Melton III, V. J. Suman, C. S. Grant, S. Sterioff, K. R. Brandt, C. Branch, T. A. Sellers, and L. C. Hartmann
Breast Biopsy Utilization: A Population-Based Study
Arch Intern Med, July 25, 2005; 165(14): 1593 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, C. Overbeeke, M. D. Kirshenbaum, P. Patel, G. Kaplan, V. Maker, C. August, and R. P. Cavallino
Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Using a Conventional Mammography Unit with an Add-On Device
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 527 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Pfarl, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Riedl, T. Wagner, M. Gnant, M. Rudas, and L. Liberman
Stereotactic 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Validation Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1503 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. B. Mainiero, I. F. Gareen, C. E. Bird, W. Smith, C. Cobb, and B. Schepps
Preferential Use of Sonographically Guided Biopsy to Minimize Patient Discomfort and Procedure Time in a Percutaneous Image-Guided Breast Biopsy Program
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2002; 21(11): 1221 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich
Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, E. Morris, C. F. Clark Jr., E. Liberty, and C. D. Lehman
Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1017 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman and H. S. Cody III
Percutaneous Biopsy and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy: Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2001; 177(4): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Parker, A. J. Klaus, P. J. Mc Wey, K. J. Schilling, T. E. Cupples, N. Duchesne, M. A. Guenin, and J. K. Harness
Sonographically Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Using a Handheld Device
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 405 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, E. Wardelmann, and H. H. Schild
MR Imaging-guided Large-Core (14-Gauge) Needle Biopsy of Small Lesions Visible at Breast MR Imaging Alone
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, C. A. Gougoutas, M. F. Zakowski, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw
Calcifications Highly Suggestive of Malignancy: Comparison of Breast Biopsy Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 165 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, C. L. Benton, D. D. Dershaw, A. F. Abramson, L. R. LaTrenta, and E. A. Morris
Learning Curve for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: How Many Cases Are Enough?
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 721 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
P. C. Stomper, C. C. Stewart, and D. L. Stoler
Stereotactic Core Biopsy Breast and Blood Cell By-products: A Source of Material for Molecular Genetics Research-Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 881 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. H. Lee, D. Carter, L. E. Philpotts, M. E. Couce, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, and I. Tocino
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed with Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Can Invasion Be Predicted?
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 466 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, L. A. Ernberg, A. Heerdt, M. F. Zakowski, E. A. Morris, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. D. Dershaw
Palpable Breast Masses: Is There a Role for Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Biopsy?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
W. E. Burak Jr, K. E. Owens, M. B. Tighe, L. Kemp, S. A. Dinges, C. L. Hitchcock, and J. Olsen
Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Histologic Underestimation of Malignant Lesions
Arch Surg, June 1, 2000; 135(6): 700 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. E. Reynolds
Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1245 - 1250.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. K. Melotti and W. A. Berg
Core Needle Breast Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Anticoagulation Therapy: Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 245 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
J. M. Hrung, C. P. Langlotz, S. G. Orel, K. R. Fox, M. D. Schnall, and J. S. Schwartz
Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging and Core-Needle Biopsy in the Preoperative Work-up of Suspicious Breast Lesions
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 39 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. H. Lee, L. E. Philpotts, L. J. Horvath, and I. Tocino
Follow-up of Breast Lesions Diagnosed as Benign with Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy: Frequency of Mammographic Change and False-Negative Rate
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
R. J. Jackman, K. W. Nowels, J. Rodriguez-Soto, F. A. Marzoni Jr, S. I. Finkelstein, and M. J. Shepard
Stereotactic, Automated, Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: False-Negative and Histologic Underestimation Rates after Long-term Follow-up
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
H. Seoudi, J. Mortier, R. Basile, and E. Curletti
Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Initial Experience With a Promising Technique
Arch Surg, April 1, 1998; 133(4): 366 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
D. N. Smith, R. Christian, and J. E. Meyer
Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Cancers: The Impact on Subsequent Surgical Excisions
Arch Surg, March 1, 1997; 132(3): 256 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
K. L. Kirklin, D. Thickman, and M. D. Smith
Pseudoaneurysm: A Comnplication Secondary to Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1996; 12(5): 220 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.