AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Behan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Behan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 893-898, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Digital subtraction in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine

JG Murray, JP Stack, JT Ennis and M Behan
Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the routine use of digital image subtraction as an adjunct to standard MR sequences in patients with failed lumbar spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images of 112 consecutive patients with failed back surgery were reviewed, and corresponding axial images at the level of previous surgery were digitally subtracted by using standard software. The technique was successful in 96 patients and was abandoned in 16 owing to patient motion. Two radiologists independently assessed the subtracted images for areas of enhancement not seen on T1-weighted images, and suggested a diagnosis based on a combination of the findings on standard and subtracted images. This diagnosis was compared with the original MR diagnosis, and surgical findings were sought in cases of conflict. RESULTS. Enhancement was best seen on the subtracted images in muscle fascial planes (100%), anterior epidural fibrosis (55%), spinal canal fat (31%), posterior epidural fibrosis (27%), types I and II marrow change (24%), and facet joints (17%). Subtraction improved the homogeneity of contrast enhancement, thereby improving the visualization of nerve roots lying in scar tissue (16%), and better defined the extent of epidural fibrosis, particularly when the fibrosis was contiguous with fat. The subtracted image increased diagnostic confidence in 25% of cases, but altered final diagnosis in only two patients. CONCLUSION. Although digital subtraction revealed areas of enhancement not seen on standard spin-echo MR images, it rarely altered final diagnosis and does not appear to be useful for routine imaging of patients with failed lumbar spine surgery. It might, however, be useful for increasing diagnostic confidence or as a problem-solving technique in selected patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. BODEN
Current Concepts Review - The Use of Radiographic Imaging Studies in the Evaluation of Patients Who Have Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 114 - 24.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.