AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bude, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bude, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 913-917, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of Achilles tendon xanthoma in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: MR vs sonography

RO Bude, RS Adler and DR Bassett
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Taubman Center, Ann Arbor 48109.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the characteristic MR appearance of the xanthomatous tendons of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and (2) to determine which of two imaging techniques, high-frequency linear-array sonography or MR imaging, is better for detection of xanthomas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sonography and MR imaging were performed to evaluate the Achilles tendons in 10 patients (20 tendons) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. For sonography, 7.5- (nine patients) and 10.0- (one patient) MHz transducers were used. T1-weighted, proton density- weighted, and T2-weighted MR images were obtained at 0.5 T (four patients) and 1.5 T (six patients), including fat-suppressed (six patients) and water-suppressed (one patient) T1-weighted images at 1.5 T. Tendon abnormalities detected with both techniques were noted, and the results were compared. RESULTS. In all tendons, sonograms showed focal hypoechoic lesions compatible with xanthomas. MR images did not show focal lesions. Instead, all pulse sequences showed a diffuse speckled or reticulated pattern or both on axial images. This speckled or reticulated appearance was more obvious on fat-suppressed T1- weighted images and much less evident on water-suppressed T1-weighted images. Contrast resolution was subjectively better on sonograms than on MR images in all cases. CONCLUSION. The speckled or reticulated appearance is a characteristic, if not pathognomonic, MR feature of xanthomatous tendons and probably is due to edema or inflammation, not intratendinous lipid. However, localized lipid deposits detected on sonograms are more readily quantified than are the lesions seen on MR images. Therefore, we think sonography, rather than MR imaging as performed in our study, is the technique of choice for detecting xanthomas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
G. Kolovou, D. Daskalova, I. Mastorakou, K. Anagnostopoulou, and D. V. Cokkinos
Regression of Achilles Tendon Xanthomas Evaluated by CT Scan After Hypolipidemic Treatment with Simvastatin: A Case Report
Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 335 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Z. S. Rosenberg, J. Beltran, and J. T. Bencardino
MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 153S - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. A. Narvaez, J. Narvaez, R. Ortega, C. Aguilera, A. Sanchez, and E. Andia
Painful Heel: MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 333 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.