AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lamki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lamki, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 1047-1052, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of injuries of the aorta and brachiocephalic arteries caused by blunt chest trauma: CT vs aortography

RG Fisher, MH Chasen and N Lamki
Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of chest CT in the triage of patients with potential injuries of the aorta and brachiocephalic arteries caused by blunt trauma and to test the value of chest CT scans in limiting the number of screening aortograms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective study was done with 107 patients who were examined because of possible laceration of the aorta or brachiocephalic vessels. Chest radiographs were obtained in 107 patients, aortograms in 105, and chest CT scans in 90. This evaluation concentrates on the 88 patients who had both CT and aortography. Findings on CT scans were categorized as normal, equivocal, suggestive of, subtly positive for, or grossly positive for mediastinal hematoma. RESULTS. Findings on CT scans were considered normal in 18 patients. Sixteen had normal aortographic findings. Two of the 18 had clinical follow-up without aortography. Findings on CT scans were considered equivocal in 25 patients, suggestive of hematoma in 13, subtly positive for hematoma in 24, and grossly positive for hematoma in 10. Subsequent aortography showed injuries in four patients who had abnormal CT findings. Nineteen other patients had aortography because of grossly abnormal findings on chest radiographs, and one aortic injury was detected. CONCLUSION. The value of chest CT as a preliminary procedure to avoid thoracic aortography in patients with blunt trauma was limited in our series. Chest CT scans with normal findings effectively exclude aortic/brachiocephalic injury; however, only about 25% of our patients had chest CT scans with unequivocally normal findings, and most patients required further evaluation with aortography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sammer, E. Wang, C. C. Blackmore, T. R. Burdick, and W. Hollingworth
Indeterminate CT Angiography in Blunt Thoracic Trauma: Is CT Angiography Enough?
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 603 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Wong, M. B. Gotway, A. D. Sasson, and R. B. Jeffrey
Periaortic Hematoma at Diaphragmatic Crura at Helical CT: Sign of Blunt Aortic Injury in Patients with Mediastinal Hematoma
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 185 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. W. Downing, J. S. Sperling, S. E. Mirvis, M. G. Cardarelli, T. B. Gilbert, T. M. Scalea, and J. S. McLaughlin
Experience with spiral computed tomography as the sole diagnostic method for traumatic aortic rupture
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Parker, T. L. Matheson, A. V. Rao, C. D. Sherbourne, K. G. Jordan, M. J. Landay, G. L. Miller, and J. A. Summa
Making the Transition: The Role of Helical CT in the Evaluation of Potentially Acute Thoracic Aortic Injuries
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1267 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. S. Dyer, E. E. Moore, M. F. Mestek, S. M. Bernstein, D. N. Iklé, J. D. Durham, M. J. Heinig, P. D. Russ, D. L. Symonds, D. A. Kumpe, et al.
Can Chest CT Be Used to Exclude Aortic Injury?
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.