American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 1067-1071, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification

HJ Burhenne, LW Burhenne, F Goldberg, TG Hislop, AJ Worth, PM Rebbeck and L Kan
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. Interval cancers in an annual mammography screening program are defined as cancers detected within 12 months after a mammographic screening in which findings are considered normal. Our objective was to analyze interval cancers for histologic type, tumor size, staging, and histologic grade. A classification for interval cancers is presented. Detection of interval cancers is an integral part of quality control and is required for the establishment of sensitivity rates for screening mammography, a necessary part of implementing the recommendations for breast cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 47,583 mammographic screening examinations of 38,219 women were available for review for the period of July 1988 to March 1991. Linkage with the provincial population-based cancer registry provided identification of all interval cancers of the breast. Histologic analysis of breast cancers was provided by an internationally recognized breast cancer pathologist who interpreted the specimens twice. RESULTS. A total of 207 breast cancers were detected at mammographic screening (true-positive cancers) during the first 33 months of the program, and 37 interval cancers were identified during the 33 months of screening plus a 12-month interval. Blinded review by three radiologists experienced in screening mammography resulted in classification of 21 of 37 cases as true interval cancers and 16 cases as misses. No interval cancers were missed because of poor mammographic technique. The sensitivity of screening mammography was 85%, 63% for patients less than 50 years old and 89% for patients more than 50 years old. The specificity was 93% for all patients (both younger and older than 50 years). CONCLUSION. The availability of a population-based cancer registry in the province of British Columbia makes an accurate determination of interval cancers and sensitivity rates possible. These data are essential for quality analysis, program planning, and education of radiologists in screening mammography. There were more true interval cancers than misses, and histologic analysis demonstrated that the majority of interval cancers were in stages I and II.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-W. Jeong, D. C. Shin, S.-H. Do, C. Blanco, N. E. Klipfel, D. R. Holmes, L. J. Hovanessian-Larsen, and V. Z. Marmarelis Differentiation of Cancerous Lesions in Excised Human Breast Specimens Using Multiband Attenuation Profiles From Ultrasonic Transmission Tomography J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2008; 27(3): 435 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Smith, D. Saslow, K. Andrews Sawyer, W. Burke, M. E. Costanza, W. P. Evans III, R. S. Foster Jr., E. Hendrick, H. J. Eyre, and S. Sener American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003 CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2003; 53(3): 141 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Nodine, C. Mello-Thoms, S. P. Weinstein, H. L. Kundel, E. F. Conant, R. E. Heller-Savoy, S. E. Rowlings, and J. A. Birnbaum Blinded Review of Retrospectively Visible Unreported Breast Cancers: An Eye-Position Analysis Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Yankaskas, M. J. Schell, R. E. Bird, and D. A. Desrochers Reassessment of Breast Cancers Missed During Routine Screening Mammography: A Community-Based Study Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Brenner, L. W. Bassett, L. L. Fajardo, D. D. Dershaw, W. P. Evans III, R. Hunt, C. Lee, I. Tocino, P. Fisher, M. McCombs, et al. Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: A Multi-institutional Prospective Trial Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. P. Poplack, A. N. Tosteson, M. R. Grove, W. A. Wells, and P. A. Carney Mammography in 53,803 Women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 832 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. L. Porter, D. White, C. A. Finder, S. H. Taplin, and E. White Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers J Natl Cancer Inst, July 5, 2000; 92(13): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles Multiple Bilateral Masses Detected on Screening Mammography: Assessment of Need for Recall Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Gilliland, N. Joste, P. M. Stauber, W. C. Hunt, R. Rosenberg, G. Redlich, and C. R. Key Biologic Characteristics of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancers J Natl Cancer Inst, May 3, 2000; 92(9): 743 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Warren Burhenne, S. A. Wood, C. J. D'Orsi, S. A. Feig, D. B. Kopans, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, E. A. Sickles, L. Tabar, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Castellino Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 554 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W K Cowan, B Angus, J C Gray, L G Lunt, and S R. Al-Tamimi A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2000; 53(2): 140 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Berg and P. L. Gilbreath Multicentric and Multifocal Cancer: Whole-Breast US in Preoperative Evaluation1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 59 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. L. Porter, A. Y. El-Bastawissi, M. T. Mandelson, M. G. Lin, N. Khalid, E. A. Watney, L. Cousens, D. White, S. Taplin, and E. White Breast Tumor Characteristics as Predictors of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers J Natl Cancer Inst, December 1, 1999; 91(23): 2020 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]