AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cats, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cats, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 1095-1100, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely?

DS Lu, S Saini, PF Hahn, M Goldberg, MJ Lee, R Weissleder, B Gerard, E Halpern and A Cats
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

OBJECTIVE. Fat suppression has shown promise in improving the quality of T2-weighted spin-echo MR images of the upper part of the abdomen. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fat-suppressed images should be routinely used in lieu of conventional images. Accordingly, we prospectively compared the two techniques in a series of patients with both normal and abnormal findings in the upper part of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Conventional and fat-suppressed T2- weighted spin-echo images (3000/80,160 [TR/TE]) were obtained in 45 consecutive patients referred for MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen. Thirty-three patients had abnormal findings, and 22 of those 33 patients had histologic or follow-up confirmation of the diagnosis (14 with metastasis, one with hepatoma, four with hemangiomas, and three with cysts). Signal intensities (hepatic lesions, liver, spleen) and noise were measured to calculate signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios. Qualitative comparison (liver, hepatic lesions, porta hepatis, spleen, pancreas, bowel, kidneys, adrenal glands, noise), evaluation of the number of hepatic lesions, and characterization of hepatic lesions were done by independent observers. RESULTS. Compared with conventional images, fat-suppressed images had higher signal-to-noise ratios (lesions, liver, spleen) and contrast-to- noise ratios (lesion-liver and spleen-liver) (p < .005). In qualitative comparison, three of three radiologists preferred fat-suppressed over conventional images for depiction of hepatic lesions and all upper abdominal organs except the liver, for which no clear preference was shown for either technique. Detection rates for hepatic lesions were similar with both types of images (observer 1: 112 lesions on fat- suppressed vs 118 on conventional images, observer 2: 142 vs 135), as was the characterization of hepatic lesions (91% accuracy on fat- suppressed images and 84% accuracy on conventional images, for 22 proved lesions and two observers). CONCLUSION. Fat-suppressed T2- weighted spin-echo MR images were better than non-fat-suppressed images for evaluation of the upper part of the abdomen. These results suggest that fat suppression should be routinely used in T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, S. B. Jeon, and J. M. Lee
Feasibility of Application of Sensitivity Encoding to the Breath-Hold T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence for Evaluation of Focal Hepatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Hori, T. Murakami, T. Kim, M. Kanematsu, K. Tsuda, S. Takahashi, M. Takamura, H. Hoshi, and H. Nakamura
Single Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: Value of Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo and Multishot Spin-Echo Echoplanar Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1423 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ward, F. Chen, J. A. Guthrie, D. Wilson, J. P. A. Lodge, J. I. Wyatt, and P. J. Robinson
Hepatic Lesion Detection after Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement: Comparison of Five T2-weighted Sequences at 1.0 T by Using Alternative-Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, and H. Nakamura
Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of Four Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR Imaging Pulse Sequences
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ward, K. S. Naik, J. A. Guthrie, D. Wilson, and P. J. Robinson
Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of MR Imaging after the Administration of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with Dual-Phase CT by Using Alternative–Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 459 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.