AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dalinka, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dalinka, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 1131-1135, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: value of fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo pulse sequences

DA Rubin, JB Kneeland, J Listerud, SJ Underberg-Davis and MK Dalinka
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

OBJECTIVE. Contrast can be similar on fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo MR images, but data acquisition is faster with fast spin-echo sequences. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of fast spin-echo sequences in the detection of meniscal tears in the knee, with the established conventional spin-echo technique used as a reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We imaged 66 consecutive patients (129 menisci) who were referred for MR examination with suspected meniscal tears. We used our routine two-dimensional, multisection, long repetition time/double-echo spin-echo sequence and one of two fast spin-echo sequences. The fast spin-echo parameters were chosen to minimize the loss of high-resolution detail while otherwise maintaining the sequence as close as possible to the spin-echo sequence. We then did a retrospective evaluation of the fast spin-echo images, using the spin-echo images as the gold standard. RESULTS. Fast spin-echo images showed only 30 (65%) of the 46 meniscal tears seen on the conventional spin-echo images. In addition, four of the 30 tears seen with both sequences were diagnosed with greater confidence on the conventional spin-echo images. In the cases in which both sequences allowed a diagnosis of definite meniscal tear, the abnormalities tended to be more conspicuous on the spin-echo images. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that the fast spin-echo sequence should not be used for the diagnosis of meniscal tears.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. De Smet and M. J. Tuite
Use of the "Two-Slice-Touch" Rule for the MRI Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 911 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. R. Ramnath, T. Magee, N. Wasudev, and R. Murrah
Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. B. Blackmon, N. M. Major, and C. A. Helms
Comparison of Fast Spin-Echo Versus Conventional Spin-Echo MRI for Evaluating Meniscal Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1740 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Vasanawala, B. A. Hargreaves, J. M. Pauly, D. G. Nishimura, C. F. Beaulieu, and G. E. Gold
Rapid Musculoskeletal MRI with Phase-Sensitive Steady-State Free Precession: Comparison with Routine Knee MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1450 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke
Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A. Helms
The Meniscus: Recent Advances in MR Imaging of the Knee
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1115 - 1122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. C. Semelka and T. K. G. Helmberger
Contrast Agents for MR Imaging of the Liver
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.