AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, K. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 162, 1431-1437, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations

MR Patel, RA Klufas, D Kim, RR Edelman and KC Kent
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA.

Although conventional angiography has traditionally been the preoperative study of choice before carotid endarterectomy, alternative noninvasive methods, particularly MR angiography, are being used increasingly for evaluation of the carotid bifurcation [1, 2]. In this essay, we illustrate the limitations of and artifacts associated with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography vs conventional angiography when assessing disease of the carotid bifurcation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
A. Mousa, J. Bernheim, R. Lyon, R. Dayal, S. Hollenbeck, P. Henderson, D. Clair, K. C. Kent, and P. L. Faries
Postcarotid Endarterectomy Pseudoaneurysm Treated with Combined Stent Graft and Coil Embolization: A Case Report
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2005; 39(2): 191 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
O. E. H. Elgersma, A. F. J. Wüst, P. C. Buijs, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali
Multidirectional Depiction of Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography versus Rotational and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
M. Eliasziw, R.N. Rankin, A.J. Fox, R.B. Haynes, and H.J.M. Barnett
Accuracy and Prognostic Consequences of Ultrasonography in Identifying Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis
Stroke, October 1, 1995; 26(10): 1747 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.