American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 127-131, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat-suppressed T1-weighted vs conventional MR images

HK Ha, YT Lim, HS Kim, TS Suh, HH Song and SJ Kim
Department of Radiology, Catholic University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare fat-suppressed T1- weighted with conventional MR images for the diagnosis of endometriosis, focusing on the detectability of peritoneal implants, and to evaluate the usefulness of MR imaging in predicting the severity of disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We analyzed the MR images of 31 patients with clinically suspected endometriosis. Laparoscopy confirmed no evidence of disease in two and endometriosis in 29. Conventional T1- and T2-weighted images and supplementary axial fat-suppressed images were obtained in all patients. In both groups, detection of endometriotic lesions with MR imaging was compared with detection at laparoscopy. Only the findings on fat-suppressed images were used to evaluate the usefulness of MR imaging in predicting the severity of disease. Early stages of disease included stages I and II; advanced stages of disease included stages III and IV. RESULTS. Diagnostic accuracy was higher with fat-suppressed imaging (77%) than with conventional imaging (55%) (p = .06). The overall sensitivity in detecting peritoneal implants was significantly higher with fat- suppressed imaging (61%) than with conventional imaging (27%) (p < .01). The disease was likely to be at an early stage when MR images showed peritoneal implants that were 5 mm or less in maximum diameter. The disease was likely to be at an advanced stage when MR images showed an endometrial cyst that was larger than 1.5 cm. CONCLUSION. Our results show that fat-suppressed MR imaging is more accurate in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis and is better for predicting the severity of disease than conventional MR imaging is.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Ghattamaneni, M J Weston, and J A Spencer Imaging in endometriosis Imaging, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 345 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Singh, R. Danrad, P. F. Hahn, M. A. Blake, P. R. Mueller, and R. A. Novelline MR Imaging of the Acute Abdomen and Pelvis: Acute Appendicitis and Beyond RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1419 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Imaoka, A. Wada, Y. Kaji, T. Hayashi, M. Hayashi, M. Matsuo, and K. Sugimura Developing an MR Imaging Strategy for Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1431 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Lee Imaging Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3_Supplement): S457 - S459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Lee Radiological reasoning: imaging characterization of bilateral adnexal masses. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3 Suppl): S460 - S466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Kataoka, K. Togashi, T. Yamaoka, T. Koyama, H. Ueda, H. Kobayashi, M. Rahman, T. Higuchi, and S. Fujii Posterior Cul-de-Sac Obliteration Associated with Endometriosis: MR Imaging Evaluation Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bazot, E. Darai, R. Hourani, I. Thomassin, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and J.-N. Buy Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging for Diagnosis and Prediction of Extension of Disease Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Imaoka, A. Wada, M. Matsuo, M. Yoshida, H. Kitagaki, and K. Sugimura MR Imaging of Disorders Associated with Female Infertility: Use in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1401 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Sinaii, S.D. Cleary, M.L. Ballweg, L.K. Nieman, and P. Stratton High rates of autoimmune and endocrine disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and atopic diseases among women with endometriosis: a survey analysis Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2715 - 2724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rieber, K. Nussle, I. Stohr, D. Grab, S. Fenchel, R. Kreienberg, S. N. Reske, and H.-J. Brambs Preoperative Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors with MR Imaging: Comparison with Transvaginal Sonography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Histologic Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 123 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Umaria and J F Olliff Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 556 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Woodward, R. Sohaey, and T. P. Mezzetti Jr Endometriosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 193 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Siegelman and E. K. Outwater Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 5 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text]