American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 31-35, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Volumetric high-resolution CT in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose

CE Engeler, JH Tashjian, CM Engeler, RA Geise, JC Holm and ER Ritenour
Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis 55455.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of volumetric high-resolution CT in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis when four contiguous sections were acquired at each of three levels. The potential benefits were weighed against the increased radiation dose of multiple scans. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. High-resolution CT scans of four contiguous sections were obtained at each of three locations (the aortic arch, the carina, and 2 cm above the diaphragm) in 50 consecutive patients (mean age, 44 years old) with known or suspected interstitial lung disease or bronchiectasis who were referred for evaluation with high-resolution CT. Each individual scan was analyzed for the presence of motion-induced streaking, blurring, or doubling. The diagnostic information contained in each set of four scans was compared with that contained in the first of the four scans in the set. RESULTS. Motion degraded at least one of the four images in each set in 69 (46%) of 150 volumetric acquisitions. When the full set of four images was considered instead of just the first scan from the set, the number of motion-free studies in patients with suboptimal respiratory suspension was increased by 40% (from 99 to 139). Diagnostic accuracy was improved as more features were identified on contiguous scans: the sensitivity of the first scan compared with that of the complete set of four scans was 84% for the detection of bronchiectasis, 97% for ground- glass opacity, 88% for honeycombing, 88% for septal thickening, and 86% for nodular opacities. Although the integral radiation exposure for a set of four CT scans was 2.8 times that of a single scan obtained with standard technique, peak skin exposure was unchanged. Slightly increased image noise with the reduced technique compromised diagnostic ability in 6% of studies. CONCLUSION. The use of volumetric high- resolution CT increased diagnostic accuracy, particularly for bronchiectasis at the lung bases, without increasing peak skin radiation exposure. With the availability of four contiguous scans per anatomic level, the subjective confidence in interpretation and number of motion-free studies also increased.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Dodd, C. A. Souza, and N. L. Muller Conventional high-resolution CT versus helical high-resolution MDCT in the detection of bronchiectasis. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 414 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Kazerooni High-Resolution CT of the Lungs Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 501 - 519. [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, R. D. Bruening, T. Helmberger, A. Staebler, P. Leimeister, and M. F. Reiser Electrocardiographically Gated Thin-Section CT of the Lung Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 649 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text]