AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by MacErlaine, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by MacErlaine, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 311-315, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Pain and increased mammographic density in women receiving hormone replacement therapy: a prospective study

MM McNicholas, JP Heneghan, MH Milner, T Tunney, JB Hourihane and DP MacErlaine
Department of Radiology, University College Dublin, Ireland.

OBJECTIVE. A prospective study was designed to evaluate the effects of hormone replacement therapy on mammographic density in postmenopausal women. The possible association of breast pain with increased mammographic density was evaluated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-three postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy for a mean of 11 months had mammography before and after commencing treatment. As a control, 31 postmenopausal women who never had hormone therapy also had baseline and follow-up mammograms after a mean of 13 months. Subjects were asked whether breast pain, which they graded as mild, moderate, or severe, had developed since their entry into the study. Baseline and follow-up mammograms were assessed objectively and subjectively for interval changes in density. The presence of breast pain was correlated with changes in density on the mammograms. RESULTS. A subjective increase in mammographic density was seen in nine (27%) of the women taking hormones and in none of the control subjects (p = .002). Changes were focal in four, multifocal in four, and diffuse in one. An increase in density was seen with all types of treatment used, and was noted as early as 4 months after the start of treatment. Seven (78%) of nine patients with mammographic changes had breast pain, which they classed as moderate or severe, that had developed since the start of treatment. In five patients with mild or moderate breast pain, an increase in density was not shown on mammograms. Of the 21 women taking hormones who did not have breast pain, increased density on follow-up mammograms was shown in only two (p = .004). None of the patients in the control group had breast pain. CONCLUSION. Focal, multifocal, or diffuse mammographic increases in density occur in a significant percentage of women undergoing hormone replacement therapy. A large proportion of these women have breast pain. Increased mammographic density appears to be associated with breast pain in women receiving hormones. This has implications for mammography in women receiving hormone replacement therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Changes in Mammographic Density
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. J. Crandall, A. Karlamangla, M.-H. Huang, G. Ursin, M. Guan, and G. A. Greendale
Association of New-Onset Breast Discomfort With an Increase in Mammographic Density During Hormone Therapy
Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2006; 166(15): 1578 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. J. Aiello, S. S. Tworoger, Y. Yasui, F. Z. Stanczyk, J. Potter, C. M. Ulrich, M. Irwin, and A. McTiernan
Associations among Circulating Sex Hormones, Insulin-Like Growth Factor, Lipids, and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1411 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.-P. Chen, Y.-C. Cheung, L.-F. Teng, and Y.-K. Soong
The relationship between mammographic density and duration of hormone therapy: effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1741 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. J. Aiello, D. S.M. Buist, E. White, and P. L. Porter
Association between Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 662 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. Cheek, J. Lacy, S. Toth-Fejel, K. Morris, K. Calhoun, and R. F. Pommier
The Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Detection and Stage of Breast Cancer
Arch Surg, September 1, 2002; 137(9): 1015 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. I. Pritchard
Hormone Replacement in Women with a History of Breast Cancer
Oncologist, August 1, 2001; 6(4): 353 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
E. Sala, R. Warren, J. McCann, S. Duffy, R. Luben, and N. Day
High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 29(4): 629 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Baines and R. Dayan
A Tangled Web: Factors Likely to Affect the Efficacy of Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 1999; 91(10): 833 - 838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, A. Sie, H. R. Singh, L. K. Olson, O. Gatewood, L. W. Bassett, C. Wasilauskas, T. Bush, E. Barrett-Connor, et al.
Effects of Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin on Mammographic Parenchymal Density
Ann Intern Med, February 16, 1999; 130(4_Part_1): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.