AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caines, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caines, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 317-321, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Stereotaxic needle core biopsy of breast lesions using a regular mammographic table with an adaptable stereotaxic device

JS Caines, MD McPhee, GP Konok and BA Wright
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Camp Hill Medical Center, Halifax, N.S., Canada.

OBJECTIVE. Fine-needle aspiration and stereotaxic needle core biopsy (SNCB) are techniques used in the workup of breast lesions suggestive of cancer. Many surgeons are reluctant to rely on fine needle results, and until now, SNCB could be done only with a dedicated biopsy table. Our study was done to determine whether SNCB could be performed safely and effectively with a regular mammography unit and an added stereotaxic device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. SNCB was performed on 254 patients by using a Siemens Mammomat 2 regular mammography table with an added stereotaxic device. Patients were referred from a breast screening center, a local tertiary care center, and from our own center. Patients who had unequivocal histopathologic evidence of a benign process (133 of 254 patients) did not undergo surgical biopsy and are being followed up mammographically. The remainder (121 patients) all had surgical biopsies. RESULTS. Sufficient material for histologic analysis was obtained in 249 (98%) of 254 cases. In 31 of 254 cases, sampling was problematic. This group comprised cases in which the patient moved within the compression device, the mammographic and histologic diagnoses were discordant, or calcifications were not present in the core sample when the indication for SNCB was the presence of microcalcifications. This group all had open biopsies. In 25 of 254 cases, the pathologic findings were suggestive of cancer. Cancer was detected in 11 of these cases on open biopsy. Of the 14 benign cases, 11 showed atypical features or ductal hyperplasia on open biopsy. Malignant tumor was diagnosed in 60 of 254 cases by SNCB. Corresponding malignant tumor was seen in 59 of 60 of the open biopsy specimens. CONCLUSION. The SNCB technique is not limited to use on a dedicated biopsy table but can be readily adapted to a regular mammography unit. It is a safe, reliable and cost-effective procedure that often spares the patient a surgical procedure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. Koskela, M. Sudah, M. H. Berg, V. J. Karja, P. K. Mustonen, V. Kataja, and R. S. Vanninen
Add-on Device for Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: How Many Biopsy Specimens Are Needed for a Reliable Diagnosis?
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 801 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. T. Yang, G. J. Whitman, M. M. Johnson, M. Bolanos-Clark, A. C. Kushwaha, K. K. Hunt, and P. J. Dempsey
Needle Localization for Excisional Biopsy of Breast Lesions: Comparison of Effect of Use of Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammographic Guidance on Procedure Time
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 277 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, and C. Overbeeke
Beware of False Claims
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 1084 - 1084.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, C. Overbeeke, M. D. Kirshenbaum, P. Patel, G. Kaplan, V. Maker, C. August, and R. P. Cavallino
Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Using a Conventional Mammography Unit with an Add-On Device
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 527 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich
Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, E. Morris, C. F. Clark Jr., E. Liberty, and C. D. Lehman
Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1017 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Becker, D. Taves, L. McCurdy, G. Muscedere, S. Karlik, and S. Ward
Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Comparison of Film Versus Digital Mammography, Both Using an Add-On Unit
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1451 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. Brenner, L. W. Bassett, L. L. Fajardo, D. D. Dershaw, W. P. Evans III, R. Hunt, C. Lee, I. Tocino, P. Fisher, M. McCombs, et al.
Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: A Multi-institutional Prospective Trial
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 866 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. J. Welle, M. Clark, S. Loos, D. Pauls, D. Warden, M. Sheffield, and C. Parsells
Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Recumbent Biopsy Using Add-On Upright Equipment
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 59 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
K. L. Kirklin, D. Thickman, and M. D. Smith
Pseudoaneurysm: A Comnplication Secondary to Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1996; 12(5): 220 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.