|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 317-321, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
JS Caines, MD McPhee, GP Konok and BA Wright
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Camp Hill Medical Center, Halifax, N.S., Canada.
OBJECTIVE. Fine-needle aspiration and stereotaxic needle core biopsy (SNCB) are techniques used in the workup of breast lesions suggestive of cancer. Many surgeons are reluctant to rely on fine needle results, and until now, SNCB could be done only with a dedicated biopsy table. Our study was done to determine whether SNCB could be performed safely and effectively with a regular mammography unit and an added stereotaxic device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. SNCB was performed on 254 patients by using a Siemens Mammomat 2 regular mammography table with an added stereotaxic device. Patients were referred from a breast screening center, a local tertiary care center, and from our own center. Patients who had unequivocal histopathologic evidence of a benign process (133 of 254 patients) did not undergo surgical biopsy and are being followed up mammographically. The remainder (121 patients) all had surgical biopsies. RESULTS. Sufficient material for histologic analysis was obtained in 249 (98%) of 254 cases. In 31 of 254 cases, sampling was problematic. This group comprised cases in which the patient moved within the compression device, the mammographic and histologic diagnoses were discordant, or calcifications were not present in the core sample when the indication for SNCB was the presence of microcalcifications. This group all had open biopsies. In 25 of 254 cases, the pathologic findings were suggestive of cancer. Cancer was detected in 11 of these cases on open biopsy. Of the 14 benign cases, 11 showed atypical features or ductal hyperplasia on open biopsy. Malignant tumor was diagnosed in 60 of 254 cases by SNCB. Corresponding malignant tumor was seen in 59 of 60 of the open biopsy specimens. CONCLUSION. The SNCB technique is not limited to use on a dedicated biopsy table but can be readily adapted to a regular mammography unit. It is a safe, reliable and cost-effective procedure that often spares the patient a surgical procedure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Koskela, M. Sudah, M. H. Berg, V. J. Karja, P. K. Mustonen, V. Kataja, and R. S. Vanninen Add-on Device for Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: How Many Biopsy Specimens Are Needed for a Reliable Diagnosis? Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 801 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Yang, G. J. Whitman, M. M. Johnson, M. Bolanos-Clark, A. C. Kushwaha, K. K. Hunt, and P. J. Dempsey Needle Localization for Excisional Biopsy of Breast Lesions: Comparison of Effect of Use of Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammographic Guidance on Procedure Time Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 277 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, and C. Overbeeke Beware of False Claims Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 1084 - 1084. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, C. Overbeeke, M. D. Kirshenbaum, P. Patel, G. Kaplan, V. Maker, C. August, and R. P. Cavallino Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Using a Conventional Mammography Unit with an Add-On Device Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, E. Morris, C. F. Clark Jr., E. Liberty, and C. D. Lehman Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1017 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Becker, D. Taves, L. McCurdy, G. Muscedere, S. Karlik, and S. Ward Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Comparison of Film Versus Digital Mammography, Both Using an Add-On Unit Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1451 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Brenner, L. W. Bassett, L. L. Fajardo, D. D. Dershaw, W. P. Evans III, R. Hunt, C. Lee, I. Tocino, P. Fisher, M. McCombs, et al. Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: A Multi-institutional Prospective Trial Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Welle, M. Clark, S. Loos, D. Pauls, D. Warden, M. Sheffield, and C. Parsells Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Recumbent Biopsy Using Add-On Upright Equipment Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 59 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Kirklin, D. Thickman, and M. D. Smith Pseudoaneurysm: A Comnplication Secondary to Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1996; 12(5): 220 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |