AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 463-468, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs

MA Goldberg, M Pivovarov, WW Mayo-Smith, MP Bhalla, JG Blickman, RT Bramson, GW Boland, HJ Llewellyn and E Halpern
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

OBJECTIVE. Image data compression is an enabling technology for teleradiology and picture archive and communication systems. Compression decreases the time and cost of image transmission and the requirements for image storage. Wavelets, discovered in 1987, constitute a new compression technique that has been described in radiologic publications but, to our knowledge, no previous studies of its use have been reported. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the application of wavelet-based compression technology to digitized radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twelve radiographs with abnormal findings were digitized, compressed, and decompressed by using a new wavelet-based lossy compression algorithm. Images were compressed at ratios from 10:1 to 60:1. Seven board-certified radiologists reviewed images on a two-headed, high-resolution (2K x 2K) diagnostic workstation. Paired original and compressed/decompressed images were presented in random order. Reviewers adjusted contrast and magnification to judge whether image degradation was present, and if so, whether it was of diagnostic significance. Quantitative error measures were tabulated. RESULTS. Reviewers found no clinically relevant degradation below a compression ratio of 30:1. Skeletal radiographs appeared more sensitive to compression than did chest or abdominal radiographs, but the trend was not statistically significant. Quantitative error measures increased gradually with compression ratio. CONCLUSION. On the basis of subjective assessment of image quality and the computational efficiency of the algorithm, wavelet-base techniques appear promising for the compression of digitized radiographs. The results of this initial experience can be used to design appropriate observer performance studies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
J. Naoumova and R. Lindman
A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
K. Sayinsu, F. Isik, G. Trakyali, and T. Arun
An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2007; 29(1): 105 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, D. P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, A. N. Rubinowitz, B. S. Leitman, and J. M. Martino
Wavelet Compression of Low-Dose Chest CT Data: Effect on Lung Nodule Detection
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 70 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ohgiya, T. Gokan, H. Nobusawa, M. Hirose, N. Seino, H. Fujisawa, M. Baba, K. Nagai, K. Tanno, N. Takeyama, et al.
Acute Cerebral Infarction: Effect of JPEG Compression on Detection at CT
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 124 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Kalyanpur, V. P. Neklesa, C. R. Taylor, A. R. Daftary, and J. A. Brink
Evaluation of JPEG and Wavelet Compression of Body CT Images for Direct Digital Teleradiologic Transmission
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 772 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. S F Fraser and S. J. D McGrath
Information technology and telemedicine in sub-Saharan Africa
BMJ, August 19, 2000; 321(7259): 465 - 466.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson
Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R Brennecke, U Burgel, R Simon, G Rippin, H.P Fritsch, T Becker, and S.E Nissen
American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 687 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R.u. Brennecke, U. Burgel, R.u. Simon, G. Rippin, H. P. Fritsch, T. Becker, and S. E. Nissen
American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III: Measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1388 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.