AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fornage, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Paulus, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fornage, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Paulus, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 569-573, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Localization of impalpable breast masses: value of sonography in the operating room and scanning of excised specimens

BD Fornage, MI Ross, SE Singletary and DD Paulus
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.

OBJECTIVE. Despite the variety of techniques available, mammographically guided preoperative localization of impalpable masses in the breast can be a difficult procedure for radiologists. Furthermore, in a few cases, an impalpable lesion is clearly seen on sonograms and yet poorly seen or not visible on mammograms. Accordingly, we studied the value of localizing impalpable masses with sonography in the operating room and of scanning excised specimens to confirm successful removal of the mass. All of the lesions were visible on preoperative sonograms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-six patients had sonographic examination of the breast in the operating room to guide the localization of an impalpable mass previously seen on sonograms. In eight patients, the lesion was poorly seen or not seen on conventional mammograms. Localizing techniques included one or more of the following: insertion of a needle, injection of dye, or simple marking on the skin. In 18 cases, sonography of the freshly excised specimen was done in the operating room. The sizes of the masses (13 fibroadenomas, 10 carcinomas, two cysts, and one tubular adenoma) measured on the sonograms ranged from 0.6 to 2.7 cm (mean +/- SD, 1.2 +/- 0.5 cm). RESULTS. In all 26 cases, the mass was clearly identified on sonograms obtained in the operating room. In all 18 cases in which it was used, sonography of the specimen correctly showed the presence or absence of the lesion. In two cases, sonographic determination of the absence of the lesion in the specimen prompted immediate reexcision, which was successful. CONCLUSION. Our experience shows that sonography in the operating room is a rapid and efficient method of localizing impalpable breast masses that have been seen on sonograms. Sonography of the specimen can indicate within seconds whether the excision has been successful. This technique is particularly valuable for masses that are not visible or only poorly visible on mammograms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Erguvan-Dogan, G. J. Whitman, V. A. Nguyen, M. J. Dryden, R. J. Stafford, J. Hazle, K. R. McAlee, M. J. Phelps, M. F. Ice, H. M. Kuerer, et al.
Specimen radiography in confirmation of MRI-guided needle localization and surgical excision of breast lesions.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Mesurolle, M. El-Khoury, D. Hori, J.-P. Phancao, S. Kary, E. Kao, and D. Fleiszer
Sonography of postexcision specimens of nonpalpable breast lesions: value, limitations, and description of a method.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1014 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. S. Kaufman, L. Jacobson, B. Bachman, and L. Kaufman
Intraoperative Ultrasound Facilitates Surgery for Early Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2002; 9(10): 988 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
F. D. Rahusen, A. J. A. Bremers, H. F. J. Fabry, A.H. M. Taets van Amerongen, R. P. A. Boom, and S. Meijer
Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Versus Wire-Guided Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2002; 9(10): 994 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
Multifocal, Multicentric, and Contralateral Breast Cancers: Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.