AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bree, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bree, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 579-583, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol

RL Bree, YR Parisky, ME Bernardino, P Costello, R Leder and PC Brown
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0030.

OBJECTIVE. Because of pending efforts to reform health care in the United States, judicious use of low-osmolality contrast media is important. We studied the effects of using various concentrations and volumes of iohexol, compared with the conventional dose and concentration of diatrizoate meglumine used for CT, to determine if a more cost-effective dose results in diagnostically efficacious liver enhancement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 902 patients received one of nine different doses of IV contrast media. Eight doses of iohexol were used: 125 ml of iohexol 350 (350 mg l/ml, 44 g l/dose), 100 ml of iohexol 350 (35 g l/dose), 150 ml of iohexol 300 (300 mg l/ml, 45 g l/dose), 120 ml of iohexol 300 (36 g l/dose), 100 ml of iohexol 300 (30 g l/dose), 175 ml of iohexol 240 (240 mg l/ml, 42 g l/dose), 150 ml of iohexol 240 (36 g l/dose), and 125 ml of iohexol 240 (30 g l/dose). A single dose (150 ml) of diatrizoate meglumine 60% (w/v) was used (42 g l/dose). Contrast material was injected at a rate of 2 ml/sec. Scanning began 35-45 sec after injection. Quantitative analysis of enhancement was performed by obtaining region-of-interest measurements through the liver on scans obtained before and after injection of contrast material. Mean and maximum changes in hepatic density and mean time to maximum enhancement were measured. Mean time-density curves were subsequently derived for each dose of contrast material. Qualitative analysis of enhancement was performed by using subjective, previously defined criteria. All studies were interpreted in a double-blind fashion. RESULTS. Mean hepatic enhancement was greater with 125 ml of iohexol 350 and 150 ml of iohexol 300 than with other doses of contrast material (p < .05). Both 125 ml of iohexol 350 and 150 ml of iohexol 300 produced actual hepatic enhancement of more than 50 H for over 60 sec. The greatest maximum increase in hepatic density occurred with 125 ml of iohexol 350. When analyzed qualitatively, 150 ml of iohexol 300 resulted in the highest percentage of optimum enhancement. CONCLUSION. According to quantitative analysis, 125 ml of iohexol 350 administered at a rate of 2 ml/sec produces the best enhancement, whereas according to qualitative analysis, 150 ml of iohexol 300 produces the best enhancement. All doses of iohexol 240 provide poor enhancement compared with a conventional dose of contrast material of 150 ml of diatrizoate meglumine 60% or 150 ml of iohexol 300. A moderate cost savings can be achieved by using 125 ml of iohexol 350 for dynamic sequential CT.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Orlandini, S. Boini, S. Iochum-Duchamps, T. Batch, X. Zhu, and A. Blum
Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Megibow, G. Jacob, J. P. Heiken, E. K. Paulson, K. D. Hopper, G. Sica, S. Saini, B. A. Birnbaum, R. Redvanley, and E. K. Fishman
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Volume of Low Osmolality Contrast Medium Needed for Routine Helical Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. L. Hänninen, T. J. Vogl, R. Felfe, W. Pegios, J. Balzer, W. Clauss, and R. Felix
Detection of Focal Liver Lesions at Biphasic Spiral CT: Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Effect of Iodine Concentration in Contrast Materials
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kuszyk, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, C. A. Magee, and E. K. Fishman
Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors: Effect of Lesion Enhancement on Conspicuity in Rabbits
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 471 - 0.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. S. Gierada and K. T. Bae
Gadolinium as a CT Contrast Agent: Assessment in a Porcine Model
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 829 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.