AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guibaud, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barkun, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guibaud, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barkun, A. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 847-850, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography

L Guibaud, PM Bret, C Reinhold, M Atri and AN Barkun
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging (MR cholangiography) of the right upper quadrant of the abdomen depicts the biliary tree in considerable detail. We studied the value of this procedure for detecting stones in the common bile duct in a series of patients with proved calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images of 10 consecutive patients with stones in the common bile duct were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was proved by stone extraction in all cases. Axial, coronal, and oblique images were obtained by using heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, and the images were processed by using a maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) algorithm and a commercially available multiplanar reformatting software. Two reviewers who were not blinded to the diagnosis analyzed hard copy images and reformatted images at the MR console. The rate of stone detection was evaluated for each acquisition plane. The mean stone/bile signal-intensity ratio and the number and size of stones were recorded. RESULTS. In all patients, the entire length of the extrahepatic bile ducts was visualized, and the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis could be made on the basis of findings on MR images. Eight stones, including two that were impacted in the ampulla, were located in the distal part of the common bile duct. On the hard copy films, the stones were visible in eight of 10 coronal images, six of 10 axial images, and four of 10 oblique images. On the three- dimensional (3D) MIP reconstructions, the stones were seen in five of the coronal sets and in six of the axial sets. The best results were obtained when the multiplanar reconstruction software was used: nine of the 10 coronal sets and eight of the 10 axial sets showed stones in the bile ducts. By use of a combination of 3D MIP and multiplanar reconstruction, choledocholithiasis was detected in all 10 patients. The mean signal intensity of the stones was 58 (range, 18-87). The mean stone/bile signal-intensity ratio was 0.15 (range, 0.05-0.24). CONCLUSION. In this preliminary study, we showed that MR cholangiography, based on T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, could be an important imaging technique for patients with suspected bile duct obstruction and equivocal sonography and/or CT results. However, a large prospective clinical trial is needed to confirm these results.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Hosseinzadeh, A. Furlan, and O. Almusa
2D Thick-Slab MR Cholangiopancreatography: Does Parallel Imaging with Sensitivity Encoding Improve Image Quality and Duct Visualization?
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W327 - W334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. A. Soto
"MR Cholangiopancreatography Using HASTE (Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo) Sequences"--A Commentary
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Zhang, G. M. Israel, E. M. Hecht, G. A. Krinsky, J. S. Babb, and V. S. Lee
Isotropic 3D T2-Weighted MR Cholangiopancreatography with Parallel Imaging: Feasibility Study.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1564 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Sugita, E. Sugimura, M. Itoh, T. Ohisa, S. Takahashi, and N. Fujita
Pseudolesion of the Bile Duct Caused by Flow Effect: A Diagnostic Pitfall of MR Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 467 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Kim, B. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, A. Y. Kim, and M.-G. Lee
Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Stones: Superiority of MR Cholangiopancreatography over Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kanematsu, M. Matsuo, Y. Shiratori, H. Kondo, H. Hoshi, I. Yasuda, and H. Moriwaki
Thick-Section Half-Fourier Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement MR Cholangiopancreatography: Effects of IV Administration of Gadolinium Chelate
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, I. Yasuda, M. Matsuo, H. Nakamura, H. Hoshi, et al.
MR Cholangiography with Volume Rendering: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis in Patients with Choledocholithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1183 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Soto, M. A. Barish, O. Alvarez, and S. Medina
Detection of Choledocholithiasis with MR Cholangiography: Comparison of Three-dimensional Fast Spin-Echo and Single- and Multisection Half-Fourier Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement Sequences
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 737 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. A. Barish, E. K. Yucel, and J. T. Ferrucci
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography
N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 1999; 341(4): 258 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. T. Sica, J. Braver, M. J. Cooney, F. H. Miller, J. L. Chai, and D. F. Adams
Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with MR Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Pancreatitis
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 605 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. A. Wielopolski, J. Gaa, D. R. Wielopolski, and M. Oudkerk
Breath-hold MR Cholangiopancreatography with Three-dimensional, Segmented, Echo-planar Imaging and Volume Rendering
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
H E Adamek, J Albert, M Weitz, H Breer, D Schilling, and J F Riemann
A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction
Gut, November 1, 1998; 43(5): 680 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P. W BEARCROFT and D. J LOMAS
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Gut, August 1, 1997; 41(2): 135 - 137.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.