AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sigeti, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sigeti, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 1131-1140, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging

RN Low and JS Sigeti
Sharp and Children's MRI Center/San Diego Diagnostic Radiology, CA 92123-2740.

OBJECTIVE. We performed this study to compare contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) MR imaging with unenhanced spin-echo imaging for the detection of benign and malignant peritoneal abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed abdominal MR images of 34 patients with proved peritoneal abnormalities, including 21 patients with malignant and 13 patients with benign peritoneal disease. Six additional patients had false- positive interpretations of their MR examinations because of diaphragmatic thickening and enhancement. Unenhanced T1-weighted images, fast spin-echo T2-weighted images, and breath-hold fast multiplanar SPGR images obtained immediately and 10-15 min after IV injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine were available. Images were reviewed for evidence of peritoneal disease by two observers who had no knowledge of the clinical findings. The four types of images were separately evaluated for peritoneal thickening, masses, and abnormal enhancement. The anatomic location, thickness, and pattern of thickening of the peritoneum were noted. Results were correlated with surgical findings or results of percutaneous biopsy. RESULTS. Immediate and delayed contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar SPGR images showed malignant peritoneal tumor in all 21 cases, compared with T1-weighted images, which showed tumor in 11 cases (p < .01), and fast spin-echo T2- weighted images, which showed tumor in 13 cases (p < .01). Enhancement of the peritoneal tumor increased the tumor's conspicuity, particularly on delayed fast multiplanar SPGR images, which were selected as the best sequence for detection of peritoneal tumor in 18 of the 21 cases. The MR findings varied widely from moderately and regularly thickened, enhancing peritoneum to very thick (> 1 cm) and lobular or masslike peritoneal thickening with enhancement. Delayed fast multiplanar SPGR images showed evidence of benign peritoneal disease in all 13 cases compared with immediate fast multiplanar SPGR images, which showed disease in 12 cases (p > .05); T1-weighted images, which showed disease in four cases (p < .05); and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images, which showed disease in only one case (p < .01). In the benign forms of peritoneal disease, the peritoneum was often regular in contour and tended to be thinner than in the cases of malignant peritoneal tumor, in which the peritoneum was generally thicker and more lobular or masslike. However, significant overlap was seen between the MR findings in benign and malignant forms of peritoneal disease. CONCLUSION. Detection of peritoneal abnormalities with MR imaging can be improved by using contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar SPGR imaging. The findings of peritoneal thickening and enhancement are best depicted on delayed images.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. N. Low, R. M. Barone, J. M. Gurney, and W. D. Muller
Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms: Preoperative MR Staging and Classification Compared with Surgical and Histopathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakamoto, T. Saga, T. Ishimori, M. Mamede, K. Togashi, T. Higuchi, M. Mandai, S. Fujii, H. Sakahara, and J. Konishi
Clinical Value of Positron Emission Tomography with FDG for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1449 - 1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y.-Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater, and H. K. Kang
Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1445 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. C. Tempany, K. H. Zou, S. G. Silverman, D. L. Brown, A. B. Kurtz, and B. J. McNeil
Staging of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Comparison of Imaging Modalities-Report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 761 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. S. Siegelman and E. K. Outwater
Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.