AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salem, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lai, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salem, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lai, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 1147-1150, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease

S Salem, LM White and J Lai
Department of Radiological Sciences, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pulsed Doppler sonography can be used to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses on the basis of pulsatility index. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In an 18-month period, all patients in whom an adnexal mass was detected at sonography had further evaluation of the mass by color and pulsed Doppler sonography. Ninety-nine patients with 102 masses that were surgically removed were included in the study. The pulsatility indexes were calculated from the reproducible spectral waveforms generated from flow centrally or peripherally within or immediately adjacent to the mass. Each lesion was categorized on the basis of its gray scale morphologic features as typically benign or indeterminate/malignant in appearance. RESULTS. Of the 102 adnexal masses, 89 were benign and 13 were malignant. In seven of the 89 benign lesions, no flow could be detected, and these were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 82 benign lesions, 65 showed pulsatility indexes consistently equal to or greater than 1.0, and 17 showed pulsatility indexes of less than 1.0. Ten of the 13 malignant lesions had pulsatility indexes consistently less than 1.0, and three primary malignant tumors had their lowest pulsatility indexes ranging between 1.1 and 1.8. Sixty-five of the 68 masses with pulsatility indexes equal to or greater than 1.0 were benign, for a positive predictive value of 96% for benign disease. Ten of the 27 masses with pulsatility indexes of less than 1.0 were malignant, for a positive predictive value of 37% for malignant disease. Forty-five masses were detected in perimenopausal and postmenopausal patients. In this group, the pulsatility index had a positive predictive value of 88% for benign disease and 47% for malignant disease. In this study, 45 of 49 masses that had a typically benign sonographic appearance had pulsatility indexes equal to or greater than 1.0. All 49 masses had benign histology. In the remaining 46 masses with an indeterminate/malignant sonographic appearance, 20 of 23 with pulsatility indexes equal to or greater than 1.0 were benign, and 10 of 23 with pulsatility indexes of less than 1.0 were malignant. CONCLUSION. Our results show a high positive predictive value of high-impedance flow in benign adnexal disease and a predominance of low-impedance flow in malignant adnexal disease. However, the pulsatility indexes showed considerable overlap between benign and malignant lesions, indicating that Doppler sonography has severe limitations in the differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal disease on the basis of low-impedance flow (pulsatility index < 1.0).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Kinkel, H. Hricak, Y. Lu, K. Tsuda, and R. A. Filly
US Characterization of Ovarian Masses: A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y.-Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater, and H. K. Kang
Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1445 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Hricak, M. Chen, F. V. Coakley, K. Kinkel, K. K. Yu, G. Sica, P. Bacchetti, and C. B. Powell
Complex Adnexal Masses: Detection and Characterization with MR Imaging-Multivariate Analysis1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.