AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 1407-1411, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Directed and random biopsies of the prostate: indications based on combined results of transrectal sonography and prostate-specific antigen density determinations

MC Olson, HV Posniak, SG Fisher, ME Flisak, CG Salomon, RC Flanigan, WB Waters and JM Pyle
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153.

OBJECTIVE. We studied the usefulness of transrectal sonography, prostate-specific antigen levels, and prostate-specific antigen density as indications for directed and random biopsies of the prostate in patients with possible prostatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 141 patients with increased levels of prostate-specific antigen or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination had transrectal sonography of the prostate and determination of prostate-specific antigen density. Through sonographic visualization, all patients had biopsies of possible cancerous lesions and random biopsies of regions of the prostate that appeared normal. Histologic results were correlated with sonographic findings and determinations of prostate- specific antigen levels and prostate-specific antigen density. RESULTS. Adenocarcinoma was detected in 40 (28%) of the 141 patients. Transrectal sonography showed an abnormality that was determined by directed biopsy to be a carcinoma in 27 (68%) of the 40 patients. Transrectal sonography showed no carcinoma in 13 patients (32%) for whom random biopsy revealed a tumor. The sensitivity of sonography was 68%, and the specificity was 49%. The combination of sonographic findings suggestive of cancer and increased prostate-specific antigen density had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 75%; we calculated a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 56% for the combination of sonographic findings suggestive of tumor and increased levels of prostate-specific antigen. Thirty-nine (97%) of 40 patients with cancer had either sonographic findings suggestive of tumor or increased prostate-specific antigen density, and one (3%) had no evidence of tumor on sonography and a normal prostate-specific antigen density. CONCLUSION. Directed and random sonographic biopsies of the prostate are indicated in patients with sonographic findings suggestive of tumor and increased prostate-specific antigen density and in patients with abnormal sonographic findings and normal prostate- specific antigen density. Random biopsies are indicated in patients with normal sonographic findings and increased prostate-specific antigen density. In our series, random biopsies were not indicated in 25 of 26 patients with normal sonographic findings and normal prostate- specific antigen density. Further research on the need for random biopsies when there are no sonographic abnormalities and when prostate- specific antigen densities are not elevated is warranted.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Kuligowska, M. A. Barish, H. M. Fenlon, and M. Blake
Predictors of Prostate Carcinoma: Accuracy of Gray-Scale and Color Doppler US and Serum Markers
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.