AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 163, 1419-1423, Copyright © 1994 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR diagnosis of meniscal tears: analysis of causes of errors

AA De Smet, MJ Tuite, MA Norris and JS Swan
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, Madison 53792.

OBJECTIVE. MR imaging of the knee is an accurate method for diagnosing meniscal tears. However, MR findings do not always agree with surgical findings. In a retrospective study, we analyzed the various causes of incorrect MR diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed a series of 400 MR examinations for suspected meniscal tears in which the diagnostic accuracy was 90%. In this group, we found 70 patients in whom the original MR diagnosis did not agree with the surgical findings. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed each of the 70 MR examinations without knowledge of the original interpretation or the surgical findings. Their interpretations and the MR images then were correlated with the surgical findings. The original incorrect diagnoses were categorized as being due to unavoidable errors, errors in interpretation, or errors made because of equivocal MR findings of a tear. Unavoidable errors were defined as false- positive and false-negative diagnoses that could not be avoided, even in retrospect. RESULTS. Of the 83 original diagnostic errors made in the MR evaluation of 800 menisci, 33 (40%) were unavoidable errors, 32 (39%) were due to equivocal MR findings, and 18 (21%) were due to interpretation errors. The unavoidable errors consisted of 21 missed meniscal tears and 12 false-positive MR diagnoses. In the false- positive cases, the menisci were interpreted as torn on MR images by all three observers, but no tear was found at arthroscopy. Subtle MR findings that were equivocal for a tear caused both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. Seven of the 18 interpretation errors occurred when normal variants were mistaken for a tear. CONCLUSION. Using conventional coronal and sagittal spin-echo MR imaging, we could not identify 21 (6%) of the 333 meniscal tears, even in retrospect. In addition, subtle findings that are equivocal for a tear may still make MR diagnosis of every torn meniscus difficult even for experienced radiologists. Unavoidable false-positive diagnoses due to healed tears or tears missed at arthroscopy are an infrequent problem occurring in only 1.5% of the original 800 menisci evaluated with MR imaging.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Y. Lee, W.-H. Jee, and J.-M. Kim
Radial Tear of the Medial Meniscal Root: Reliability and Accuracy of MRI for Diagnosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 81 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. De Smet, D. H. Nathan, B. K. Graf, B. A. Haaland, and J. P. Fine
Clinical and MRI Findings Associated with False-Positive Knee MR Diagnoses of Medial Meniscal Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 93 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. De Smet and R. Mukherjee
Clinical, MRI, and Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Failure to Diagnose a Lateral Meniscal Tear on Knee MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 22 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Magee and D. Williams
3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. R. Ramnath, T. Magee, N. Wasudev, and R. Murrah
Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler
MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
T. Karachalios, M. Hantes, A. H. Zibis, V. Zachos, A. H. Karantanas, and K. N. Malizos
Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Clinical Test (the Thessaly Test) for Early Detection of Meniscal Tears
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 955 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
T. G. Sanders and M. D. Miller
A Systematic Approach to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation of Sports Medicine Injuries of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2005; 33(1): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Zanetti, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, J. Romero, B. Seifert, and J. Hodler
Patients with Suspected Meniscal Tears: Prevalence of Abnormalities Seen on MRI of 100 Symptomatic and 100 Contralateral Asymptomatic Knees
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Goddard, A Leslie, A Jones, C Wakeley, and J Kabala
Error in radiology
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 949 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. De Smet, D. A. Asinger, and R. L. Johnson
Abnormal Superior Popliteomeniscal Fascicle and Posterior Pericapsular Edema: Indirect MR Imaging Signs of a Lateral Meniscal Tear
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 63 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
O. Hauger, L. R. Frank, R. D. Boutin, N. Lektrakul, C. B. Chung, P. Haghighi, and D. Resnick
Characterization of the "Red Zone" of Knee Meniscus: MR Imaging and Histologic Correlation
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. K. Lecas, C. A. Helms, F. J. Kosarek, and W. E. Garret
Inferiorly Displaced Flap Tears of the Medial Meniscus: MR Appearance and Clinical Significance
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 161 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
T. G. Sanders, R. C. Linares, K. W. Lawhorn, P. F. J. Tirman, and C. Houser
Oblique Meniscomeniscal Ligament: Another Potential Pitfall for a Meniscal Tear-Anatomic Description and Appearance at MR Imaging in Three Cases
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 213 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
Accuracy of Imaging the Menisci on an In-Office, Dedicated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Extremity System*: Peter D. Franklin,{dagger} MD, Richard A. Lemon,{ddagger}{section} MD, and Howard S. Barden,||a PhD
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1997; 25(3): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.