AJR Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ruijs, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ruijs, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 109-115, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin- echo sequences

JO Barentsz, G Jager, JP Mugler 3rd, G Oosterhof, H Peters, LT van Erning and SH Ruijs
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, St. Radboud, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequence as a three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging technique for staging urinary bladder cancer and to compare this technique with a commonly used two-dimensional T1- weighted spin-echo sequence technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. For 28 consecutive patients with urinary bladder cancer, MR findings and staging results were compared with histopathologic findings after surgery or autopsy. MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with a Helmholtz double-surface coil. Conventional T1-weighted spin-echo, three- dimensional MP-RAGE, T2-weighted spin-echo or turbo-spin-echo, and dynamic T1-weighted fast gradient-echo sequences were used. Signal difference-to-noise ratios and T1 contrast were calculated by use of operator-defined regions of interest. RESULTS. The signal difference-to- noise ratios for fluid-tumor and fat-tumor were, respectively, factors of 1.6 and 2.7 better with T1-weighted spin-echo sequences. T1 contrast of fluid-tumor was a factor of 2.6 better with three-dimensional MP- RAGE sequences, resulting in better recognition of small tumors, ascites, and dilated ureters. T1 contrast for fat-tumor was a factor of 2.0 better with T1-weighted spin-echo sequences. With the MP-RAGE sequence, motion artifacts were fewer in number than those noted with the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, and susceptibility artifacts were equal in number to those noted with the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence. Using the three-dimensional technique, we performed off-line reconstruction of 1- to 2-mm high-resolution images in every desired plane. Because of higher spatial resolution, the availability of multiplanar reconstructions, and better fluid-tumor contrast and despite lower signal difference-to-noise ratios, three-dimensional MP- RAGE images resulted in better recognition of local tumor extension (n = 11), adhesions and bowel wall invasion (n = 5), lymph node metastases (n = 2), and bone marrow metastases (n = 2). The staging accuracy for the combination of three-dimensional MP-RAGE, T2-weighted, and dynamic sequences was 93%; that for the combination of two-dimensional T1- weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted, and dynamic sequences was 78%. Nodal staging was also more accurate with MP-RAGE sequences (accuracy of 93% vs 86% for T1-weighted spin-echo sequences). CONCLUSION. Compared with two-dimensional T1-weighted spin-echo imaging, three-dimensional MP- RAGE imaging resulted in a 15% improvement in staging. Our findings suggest that optimal staging of urinary bladder carcinoma requires three-dimensional imaging techniques.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. U. Herborn, T. C. Lauenstein, F. M. Vogt, R. B. Lauffer, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruehm
Interstitial MR Lymphography with MS-325: Characterization of Normal and Tumor-Invaded Lymph Nodes in a Rabbit Model
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1567 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Seibold, T. A. Mallisee, S. J. Erickson, M. D. Boynton, W. G. Raasch, and M. E. Timins
Rotator Cuff: Evaluation with US and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, May 1, 1999; 19(3): 685 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.