AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosmans, H.
Right arrow Articles by Baert, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosmans, H.
Right arrow Articles by Baert, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 161-167, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: comparison of acquisition techniques in healthy volunteers

H Bosmans, G Marchal, G Lukito, N Yicheng, G Wilms, G Laub and AL Baert
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals K. U. Leuven, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE. The saturation phenomenon that limits vessel visibility in unenhanced time-of-flight MR angiograms can be overcome by the injection of MR contrast agents that shorten the T1 of the blood. Unlike the situation with unenhanced MR angiographic acquisitions, in which the MR parameters must be carefully adjusted to reduce saturation effects, optimization procedures for contrast-enhanced MR angiography focus on the acquired shortening of the T1 of the blood and the time evolution of the T1 over the entire measurement. To improve the quality of contrast-enhanced time-of-flight MR angiographic acquisitions in the brain, we compared different acquisition techniques that exploit shortening of the T1 of the blood. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. High- resolution MR angiographic examinations were done with a 1-T MR system for 12 healthy volunteers. Doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight were injected on two separate days to allow for identical timing of the comparative studies after contrast material injection. The effects of dose of contrast material, MR parameters (TR and flip angle), method of injecting the contrast material (monophasic, biphasic, or continuous slow injection), and K- space acquisition schemes (regular schemes versus collecting the central K-space lines near the beginning or the end of the acquisition) were studied. RESULTS. Higher doses provided better MR angiograms. The flip angle and the TR had to be adjusted on the basis of the Ernst equation and therefore depended on an estimation of the averaged T1 value over the entire measurement. Comparison of the different K-space acquisition schemes confirmed that the evolution of the T1 of the blood over the entire measurement time is important, especially for longer measurements. There was no noticeable difference between the MR angiograms acquired with monophasic or biphasic injections. These injection schemes provided more detailed MR angiograms than did continuous slow injection over the entire measurement. CONCLUSION. Our results show that the quality of contrast-enhanced MR angiograms can be remarkably increased when acquisition techniques that exploit the short T1 of the blood are used.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Mitra, D Connolly, S Jenkins, P English, D Birchall, C Mandel, K Shrikanth, B Gregson, and A Gholkar
Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. R. Jager, H. Ellamushi, E. A. Moore, J. P. Grieve, N. D. Kitchen, and W. J. Taylor
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of Intracranial Giant Aneurysms
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2000; 21(10): 1900 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.