American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 69-71, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

CT for asbestosis: value and limitations

DA Lynch
Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.

CT is more sensitive than clinical evaluation for the detection of asbestosis but is inevitably less sensitive and less specific than pathologic evaluation. For the asbestos-exposed individual, CT is useful for the evaluation of suspected lung masses, particularly rounded atelectasis [15], for identifying pleural plaques, and for confirming unequivocal asbestosis (grade 2 or grade 3 [8]). CT also will identify and quantify emphysema as a cause of physiologic impairment. Because clinicians commonly use CT to resolve clinical uncertainties, radiologists often feel pressured to categorize disease as unequivocally present or absent. Gamsu et al. [8] show that the borderline between normal and abnormal is not always sharply defined. In the absence of pathologic proof, the diagnosis of asbestosis must be based on a thoughtful evaluation of the likelihood of asbestosis by use of all available clinical, physiologic, and radiologic information. The scoring systems used by Gamsu et al. [8] offer a practical approach to defining the likelihood of asbestosis based on CT appearances.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Copley, Y. C. G. Lee, D. M. Hansell, P. Sivakumaran, M. B. Rubens, A. J. Newman Taylor, R. M. Rudd, A. W. Musk, and A. U. Wells Asbestos-induced and Smoking-related Disease: Apportioning Pulmonary Function Deficit by Using Thin-Section CT Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Ross The Clinical Diagnosis of Asbestosis in This Century Requires More Than a Chest Radiograph Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 1120 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]