AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, N. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 603-607, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose

JR Mayo, TE Hartman, KS Lee, SL Primack, S Vedal and NL Muller
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. We wanted to determine minimal tube current (mAs) required for consistently good image quality on conventional 10-mm collimation chest CT and effect of tube current reduction on detection of mediastinal and lung abnormalities. Tube current reduction is desirable to reduce patient radiation dose. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Prospectively, 30 consecutive patients (mean weight, 68 kg; range, 34-93 kg) older than 45 undergoing conventional chest CT with standard technique (120 kVp, 400 mAs) had four additional sections imaged at reduced tube current (200, 140, 80, 20 mAs) at two levels (tracheal carina and left atrium). CT scans were evaluated in random order by two independent observers who were blinded to technical factors used. Subjective image quality was graded on a five-point scale from non-diagnostic to excellent. Visualization of mediastinal adenopathy (n = 18), pleural plaques (n = 17), effusions (n = 28), lung parenchymal nodules (n = 37), and emphysema (n = 15) were assessed. The 400 mAs scan was considered the reference standard. RESULTS. When compared with the reference technique (400 mAs), the first and second (200 mAs and 140 mAs) reduction levels showed no significant difference (p > .05) in subjective image quality. A significant difference (p < .001) was seen at the third and fourth (80 mAs and 20 mAs) reduction levels. However, no significant difference (p > .05) was seen in detection of mediastinal or lung parenchymal abnormalities with different tube currents. CONCLUSION. A twofold reduction in tube current (400-140 mAs) and resultant radiation dose did not cause a significant change in subjective image quality or in detection of mediastinal or lung abnormalities with conventional chest CT. One hundred forty milliampere- seconds is the minimal tube current required to provide good image quality in patients of average weight.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu
Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W Mazrani, K McHugh, and P J Marsden
The radiation burden of radiological investigations
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1127 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. A. Bankier, C. Schaefer-Prokop, V. De Maertelaer, D. Tack, P. Jaksch, W. Klepetko, and P. A. Gevenois
Air Trapping: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Thin-Section CT Techniques
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, and Y. Yamashita
Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W490 - W497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft
Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, W. Petit, P. Scillia, P. Muller, C. Suess, and P. A. Gevenois
Multi-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 318 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. J. Golding
Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT): the dose challenge of the new revolution
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 303 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, J. K. Lyo, D. S. Paik, A. J. Sherbondy, L. C. Chow, A. N. Leung, R. Mindelzun, P. K. Schraedley-Desmond, S. E. Zinck, D. P. Naidich, et al.
Pulmonary Nodules on Multi-Detector Row CT Scans: Performance Comparison of Radiologists and Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 274 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. R. Mayo, K.-I. Kim, S. L. S. MacDonald, T. Johkoh, P. Kavanagh, H. O. Coxson, and S. Vedal
Reduced Radiation Dose Helical Chest CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation of Structures and Lung Findings
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 749 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. A. de Jong, M. D. Ottink, S. G. F. Robben, M. H. Lequin, W. C. J. Hop, J. J. E. Hendriks, P. D. Pare, and H. A. W. M. Tiddens
Pulmonary Disease Assessment in Cystic Fibrosis: Comparison of CT Scoring Systems and Value of Bronchial and Arterial Dimension Measurements
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 434 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A J Britten, M Crotty, H Kiremidjian, A Grundy, and E J Adam
The addition of computer simulated noise to investigate radiation dose and image quality in images with spatial correlation of statistical noise: an example application to X-ray CT of the brain
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 323 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Dose Reduction in Multidetector CT Using Attenuation-Based Online Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 331 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A Yi, K. S. Lee, T. S. Kim, D. Han, Y. M. Sung, and S. Kim
Multidetector CT of Bronchiectasis: Effect of Radiation Dose on Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 501 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. R. Mayo, J. Aldrich, and N. L. Muller
Radiation Exposure at Chest CT: A Statement of the Fleischner Society
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard
Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, K. T. Bae, T. K. Pilgram, J. Suh, and D. Bradley
Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement with Multi-Detector Row CT: In Vitro Assessment of Effect of Radiation Dose
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, Y. Mori, K. Suzuki, A. Sawaki, S. Iwano, H. Satake, S. Arahata, T. Isomura, M. Ozaki, et al.
Lung: Feasibility of a Method for Changing Tube Current during Low-Dose Helical CT
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 905 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Rogers
Dose Reduction in CT: How Low Can We Go?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 299 - 299.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G Starck, L Lonn, A Cederblad, E Forssell-Aronsson, L Sjostrom, and M Alpsten
A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2002; 75(890): 140 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S J Golding and P C Shrimpton
Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge?
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J V Cook
Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V Tsapaki, S Kottou, and D Papadimitriou
Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2001; 74(885): 836 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. G. Ravenel, E. M. Scalzetti, W. Huda, and W. Garrisi
Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in Chest CT Examinations
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. L. Nickoloff and P. O. Alderson
Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 285 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Haaga
Radiation Dose Management: Weighing Risk Versus Benefit
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 289 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin
Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Cohnen, H. Fischer, J. Hamacher, E. Lins, R. Kötter, and U. Mödder
CT of the Head by Use of Reduced Current and Kilovoltage: Relationship between Image Quality and Dose Reduction
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1654 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lucaya, J. Piqueras, P. Garcia-Pena, G. Enriquez, M. Garcia-Macias, and J. Sotil
Low-Dose High-Resolution CT of the Chest in Children and Young Adults: Dose, Cooperation, Artifact Incidence, and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 985 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. E. Thomas, C. M. Owens, J. Britto, S. Nadel, P. Habibi, and R. Nicholson
Efficacy of Chest CT in a Pediatric ICU : A Prospective Study
Chest, June 1, 2000; 117(6): 1697 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, S. Arahata, T. Kodaira, T. Isomura, T. Kato, K. Yamakawa, K. Maruyama, and T. Ishigaki
Lung Cancer Screening: Minimum Tube Current Required for Helical CT
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 175 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. W. Venema, S. S. K. S. Phoa, P. G. B. Mirck, F. J. H. Hulsmans, C. B. L. M. Majoie, and B. Verbeeten Jr
Petrosal Bone: Coronal Reconstructions from Axial Spiral CT Data Obtained with 0.5-mm Collimation Can Replace Direct Coronal Sequential CT Scans
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 375 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. H. Helbich, G. Heinz-Peer, I. Eichler, P. Wunderbaldinger, M. Götz, C. Wojnarowski, R. C. Brasch, and C. J. Herold
Cystic Fibrosis: CT Assessment of Lung Involvement in Children and Adults
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 537 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Diederich, H. Lenzen, R. Windmann, Z. Puskas, T. M. Yelbuz, S. Henneken, T. Klaiber, M. Eameri, N. Roos, and P. E. Peters
Pulmonary Nodules: Experimental and Clinical Studies at Low-Dose CT
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 289 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. E. Ware, W. Huda, P. J. Mergo, and A. L. Litwiller
Radiation Effective Doses to Patients Undergoing Abdominal CT Examinations
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.