American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 1281-1284, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans

CJ Kasales, KD Hopper, DN Ariola, TR TenHave, JW Meilstrup, RP Mahraj, D Van Hook, S Westacott, RJ Sefczek and JD Barr
Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033, USA.

OBJECTIVE. This in vitro study was designed to assess the z-axis resolving capabilities of reconstructed helical CT scans obtained with various imaging parameters versus those of conventional CT scans and the effect of decreasing slice index on the z-axis resolution of helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A z-axis line-pair phantom was imaged using conventional nonoverlapped CT scans, conventional CT scans that overlapped by 50%, and helical CT scans with pitches of 1.0 and 1.5. All helical images were reconstructed at comparable slice indexes (image indexes of 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mm for pitch = 1.0, and image indexes of 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mm for pitch = 1.5). Midline coronal and sagittal reconstructed images were obtained to allow standardized visualization of line pairs. The reconstructed images were reviewed separately by 10 radiologists. RESULTS. The overall z-axis resolution of reconstructed helical CT scans equaled or exceeded that of nonoverlapped conventional CT scans in all cases and equaled that of 50% overlapped conventional CT scans in 75% of cases. The 1.0-pitch helical sequences showed improved z-axis resolution with decreasing slice index. No statistically significant improvement in z-axis resolution could be determined by the observers for 1.5-pitch sequences with decreasing slice index. CONCLUSION. The use of helical CT with a pitch of 1.0 or 1.5 and an increased slice index can improve the z-axis resolution of reconstructed images when compared with nonoverlapped conventional CT and frequently equals the resolution of 50% overlapped conventional CT. This improvement in z-axis resolution should improve the appearance of reconstructed images (as used in CT angiography and three-dimensional imaging) by reducing partial volume artifacts while affording faster scanning at a reduced skin-surface radiation dose.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Honda, T. Johkoh, S. Yamamoto, M. Koyama, N. Tomiyama, T. Kozuka, S. Hamada, N. Mihara, H. Nakamura, and N. L. Muller Comparison of Quality of Multiplanar Reconstructions and Direct Coronal Multidetector CT Scans of the Lung Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 875 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Hopper, A. T. Iyriboz, S. W. Wise, J. D. Neuman, D. T. Mauger, and C. J. Kasales Mucosal Detail at CT Virtual Reality: Surface versus Volume Rendering Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 517 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. D. Hopper, T. A. Lucas, K. Gleeson, J. L. Stauffer, R. Bascom, D. T. Mauger, and R. Mahraj Transbronchial Biopsy with Virtual CT Bronchoscopy and Nodal Highlighting Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 531 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]