AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 1425-1428, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Preparation of outpatients for excretory urography: is bowel preparation with laxatives and dietary restrictions necessary?

GA Schuster, D Nazos and GA Lewis

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine bowel preparation with laxatives and dietary restrictions (liquid supper and fasting after midnight) are necessary for satisfactory visualization of the urinary system during excretory urography in outpatients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two hundred and four consecutive patients who had excretory urography were randomly placed in one of four groups before the examination. Eleven patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. The remaining 193 were divided into four groups. Groups 1 (50 patients) and 2 (45 patients) had bowel cleansing; groups 3 (49 patients) and 4 (49 patients) did not. Groups 1 and 3 were allowed to eat; groups 2 and 4 were given a liquid supper and fasted beginning at midnight the night before the examination. Standard radiographs and tomograms were obtained. Upon completion of excretory urography, the radiographs were reviewed and graded by one radiologist, who did not know to which group each patient belonged. A detailed, anatomically based grading system was developed and used to grade the radiographs. The radiographs of the kidney were divided into upper, middle, and lower margins; images of the calices were divided into upper, middle, and lower segments; images of the renal pelvis were divided into central and medial margins; images of the ureter were divided into upper abdominal, lower abdominal, upper pelvic, and lower pelvic categories; and images of the bladder were divided into full and empty categories. A score of 1 was given to each section visualized. The right and left sides of the urinary system were scored separately but added together for statistical analyses; therefore, the highest total score possible was 28. RESULTS. In the ability to visualize the anatomic structures on excretory urograms, there was no statistically significant difference (p = .06) between images of patients who were allowed to eat (groups 1 and 3, 99 patients, mean score = 27.49 +/- 0.92) and images of patients who were given a liquid supper and then fasted from midnight the night before excretory urography was performed (groups 2 and 4, 94 patients, mean score = 27.16 +/- 1.45). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference (p = .16) between those patients given laxatives before the examination (groups 1 and 2, 95 patients, mean score = 27.45 +/- 0.93) and those not given laxatives (groups 3 and 4, 98 patients, mean score = 27.20 +/- 1.43). CONCLUSION. Our results show that bowel preparation with laxatives and dietary restrictions do not improve visualization of the urinary tract on excretory urograms obtained in outpatients. We conclude that such preparation in this group of patients was unnecessary and that it need not be performed routinely.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Jansson, H Geijer, and T Andersson
Bowel preparation for excretory urography is not necessary: a randomized trial
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Sudakoff, D. P. Dunn, R. S. Hellman, M. A. Laguna, C. R. Wilson, R. W. Prost, D. C. Eastwood, and H. J. Lim
Opacification of the Genitourinary Collecting System During MDCT Urography with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Nonsaline Versus Saline Bolus
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 122 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.