AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bos, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bos, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 27-36, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Triage of patients to angiography for detection of aortic rupture after blunt chest trauma: cost-effectiveness analysis of using CT

MG Hunink and JJ Bos
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost- effectiveness of dynamic chest CT, compared with plain chest radiography and immediate angiography, in deciding when angiography should be performed in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected aortic rupture after blunt chest trauma. The use of CT was evaluated in relation to the prior probability of aortic rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing six diagnostic strategies combining chest radiography, CT, and angiography in various sequences was performed. Effectiveness was expressed as survival to hospital discharge, and costs were those incurred to society. Estimates for the variables in the analysis were derived from published reports. The model was evaluated for two cohorts of patients: those undergoing and those not undergoing CT for the evaluation of other injuries. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all variables in the model with emphasis on the prior probability of aortic rupture. RESULTS. Selecting patients for triage to angiography based on the CT findings yielded higher effectiveness at a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than doing so based on the chest radiograph, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than $500,000 per life saved. For the cohort undergoing CT for the evaluation of other injuries, triage to angiography based on the CT findings yielded equivalent survival chances compared with immediate angiography and cost less ($1468 per patient evaluated compared with $2508). For the cohort not undergoing CT for other injuries, immediate angiography yielded the highest survival chances but was expensive, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2 million per life saved compared with triage based on CT. In the latter cohort, immediate angiography yielded higher survival chances and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $500,000 compared with the triage by CT if the prior probability of aortic rupture was 5% or more. CONCLUSION. Selecting hemodynamically stable patients after blunt chest trauma with suspected aortic rupture for angiography on the basis of CT findings is more effective than doing so based on the findings on chest radiography and is cost-effective compared with other accepted health care programs. Immediate angiography has a high incremental cost- effectiveness ratio compared with triage by CT and is warranted only in patients not undergoing CT for the evaluation of other injuries who have a prior probability of aortic rupture of 5% or more.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. M. Hunink
Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty and Resource Constraints: Examples from Trauma Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Wong, M. B. Gotway, A. D. Sasson, and R. B. Jeffrey
Periaortic Hematoma at Diaphragmatic Crura at Helical CT: Sign of Blunt Aortic Injury in Patients with Mediastinal Hematoma
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 185 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. S. Medina, E. Aguirre, B. Bernal, and N. R. Altman
Functional MR Imaging versus Wada Test for Evaluation of Language Lateralization: Cost Analysis
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. W. Downing, J. S. Sperling, S. E. Mirvis, M. G. Cardarelli, T. B. Gilbert, T. M. Scalea, and J. S. McLaughlin
Experience with spiral computed tomography as the sole diagnostic method for traumatic aortic rupture
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. S. Medina, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Pomeroy
Children With Headache Suspected of Having a Brain Tumor: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diagnostic Strategies
Pediatrics, August 1, 2001; 108(2): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, M. D. Armerding, M. D. Dake, and S. Napel
Cost Identification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Imaging by Using Time and Motion Analyses
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. C. Blackmore, A. Zweibel, and F. A. Mann
Determining Risk of Traumatic Aortic Injury: How to Optimize Imaging Strategy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. T. Gurbuz, D. S. Weiman, and J. W. Pate
Traumatic injury to the thoracic aorta
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 1116 - 1117.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.