|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 509-513, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
FG Sommer, RB Jeffrey Jr, GD Rubin, S Napel, SA Rimmer, J Benford and PM Harter
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT in patients with suspected renal colic. We hoped to determine whether this technique might create images acceptable to both radiologists and clinicians and replace our current protocol of sonography and abdominal plain film. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-four consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of renal colic were imaged with both noncontrast helical CT and a combination of plain film of the abdomen and renal sonography. Reformatting of the helical CT data was performed on a workstation to create a variety of reformatted displays. The correlative studies were interpreted by separate blinded observers. Clinical data, including the presence of hematuria and the documentation of stone passage or removal, were recorded. RESULTS. Findings on 18 CT examinations were interpreted as positive for the presence of ureteral calculi; 16 of these cases were determined to be true positives on the basis of later-documented passage of a calculus. Thirteen of the 16 cases proved to be positive were interpreted as positive for renal calculi using the combination of abdominal plain film and renal sonography. The most useful CT reformatting technique was curved planar reformatting of the ureters to determine whether a ureteral calculus was present. CONCLUSION. In this study, noncontrast helical CT was a rapid and accurate method for determining the presence of ureteral calculi causing renal colic. The reformatted views produced images similar in appearance to excretory urograms, aiding greatly in communicating with clinicians. Limitations on the technique include the time and equipment necessary for reformatting and the suboptimal quality of reformatted images when little retroperitoneal fat is present.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Paulson, C. Weaver, L. M. Ho, L. Martin, J. Li, J. Darsie, and D. P. Frush Conventional and Reduced Radiation Dose of 16-MDCT for Detection of Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mitterberger, G. M. Pinggera, E. Maier, H. Neuwirt, R. Neururer, L. Pallwein, J. Gradl, G. Bartsch, H. Strasser, and F. Frauscher Value of 3-Dimensional Transrectal/ Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Distal Ureteral Calculi J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 19 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ozden, C. Gogus, K. Turkolmez, and C. Yagci Is Fluid Ingestion Really Necessary During Ultrasonography for Detecting Ureteral Stones?: A Prospective Randomized Study J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1651 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Desser, F. G. Sommer, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr. Value of Curved Planar Reformations in MDCT of Abdominal Pathology Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1477 - 1484. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, M. E. Murphy, D. M. Delong, F. N. Tessler, and M. A. Kliewer Conspicuity of Renal Calculi at Unenhanced CT: Effects of Calculus Composition and Size and CT Technique Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 91 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Patlas, A Farkas, D Fisher, I Zaghal, and I Hadas-Halpern Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 901 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Varanelli, D. M. Coll, J. A. Levine, A. T. Rosenfield, and R. C. Smith Relationship Between Duration of Pain and Secondary Signs of Obstruction of the Urinary Tract on Unenhanced Helical CT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Raby The role of CT in acute abdominal pain Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Is spiral computed tomography the imaging modality of choice for renal colic? Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2001; 77(904): 128d - 128. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Sheafor, B. S. Hertzberg, K. S. Freed, B. A. Carroll, M. T. Keogan, E. K. Paulson, D. M. DeLong, and R. C. Nelson Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective Comparison Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 792 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Abramson, N. Walders, K. E. Applegate, R. C. Gilkeson, and M. R. Robbin Impact in the Emergency Department of Unenhanced CT on Diagnostic Confidence and Therapeutic Efficacy in Patients with Suspected Renal Colic: A Prospective Survey Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr. Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liu, S. J. Esler, B. J. Kenny, R. H. Goh, A. J. Rainbow, and G. W. Stevenson Low-Dose Nonenhanced Helical CT of Renal Colic: Assessment of Ureteric Stone Detection and Measurement of Effective Dose Equivalent Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 51 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Boridy, A. Kawashima, S. M. Goldman, and C. M. Sandler Acute Ureterolithiasis: Nonenhanced Helical CT Findings of Perinephric Edema for Prediction of Degree of Ureteral Obstruction Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 663 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ochi, K. Shimizu, Y. Yasuhara, T. Shigesawa, T. Mochizuki, and J. Ikezoe Curved Planar Reformatted CT Angiography: Usefulness for the Evaluation of Aneurysms at the Carotid Siphon AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 1999; 20(6): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Boridy, P. Nikolaidis, A. Kawashima, S. M. Goldman, and C. M. Sandler Ureterolithiasis: Value of the Tail Sign in Differentiating Phleboliths from Ureteral Calculi at Nonenhanced Helical CT Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 619 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, T. J. Vrtiska, B. F. King, A. J. LeRoy, J. P. Quam, and R. R. Hattery Image Quality and Dose Comparison among Screen-Film, Computed, and CT Scanned Projection Radiography: Applications to CT Urography Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 395 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. B. Fowler, J. A. Locken, J. H. Duchesne, and M. R. Williamson US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |