AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Harter, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Harter, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 509-513, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT

FG Sommer, RB Jeffrey Jr, GD Rubin, S Napel, SA Rimmer, J Benford and PM Harter
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT in patients with suspected renal colic. We hoped to determine whether this technique might create images acceptable to both radiologists and clinicians and replace our current protocol of sonography and abdominal plain film. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-four consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of renal colic were imaged with both noncontrast helical CT and a combination of plain film of the abdomen and renal sonography. Reformatting of the helical CT data was performed on a workstation to create a variety of reformatted displays. The correlative studies were interpreted by separate blinded observers. Clinical data, including the presence of hematuria and the documentation of stone passage or removal, were recorded. RESULTS. Findings on 18 CT examinations were interpreted as positive for the presence of ureteral calculi; 16 of these cases were determined to be true positives on the basis of later-documented passage of a calculus. Thirteen of the 16 cases proved to be positive were interpreted as positive for renal calculi using the combination of abdominal plain film and renal sonography. The most useful CT reformatting technique was curved planar reformatting of the ureters to determine whether a ureteral calculus was present. CONCLUSION. In this study, noncontrast helical CT was a rapid and accurate method for determining the presence of ureteral calculi causing renal colic. The reformatted views produced images similar in appearance to excretory urograms, aiding greatly in communicating with clinicians. Limitations on the technique include the time and equipment necessary for reformatting and the suboptimal quality of reformatted images when little retroperitoneal fat is present.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert
Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. K. Paulson, C. Weaver, L. M. Ho, L. Martin, J. Li, J. Darsie, and D. P. Frush
Conventional and Reduced Radiation Dose of 16-MDCT for Detection of Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 151 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer
Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Mitterberger, G. M. Pinggera, E. Maier, H. Neuwirt, R. Neururer, L. Pallwein, J. Gradl, G. Bartsch, H. Strasser, and F. Frauscher
Value of 3-Dimensional Transrectal/ Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Distal Ureteral Calculi
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Ozden, C. Gogus, K. Turkolmez, and C. Yagci
Is Fluid Ingestion Really Necessary During Ultrasonography for Detecting Ureteral Stones?: A Prospective Randomized Study
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1651 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop
Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. S. Desser, F. G. Sommer, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr.
Value of Curved Planar Reformations in MDCT of Abdominal Pathology
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1477 - 1484.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, M. E. Murphy, D. M. Delong, F. N. Tessler, and M. A. Kliewer
Conspicuity of Renal Calculi at Unenhanced CT: Effects of Calculus Composition and Size and CT Technique
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani
Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. R. Guest, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, J. F. Platt, C. C. Bundschu, I. R. Francis, A. Gebramarium, and U. M. Murray
Assessment of the Clinical Utility of the Rim and Comet-Tail Signs in Differentiating Ureteral Stones from Phleboliths
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1285 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart
Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Patlas, A Farkas, D Fisher, I Zaghal, and I Hadas-Halpern
Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 901 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Varanelli, D. M. Coll, J. A. Levine, A. T. Rosenfield, and R. C. Smith
Relationship Between Duration of Pain and Secondary Signs of Obstruction of the Urinary Tract on Unenhanced Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
N Raby
The role of CT in acute abdominal pain
Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen
Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
Is spiral computed tomography the imaging modality of choice for renal colic?
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2001; 77(904): 128d - 128.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. H. Sheafor, B. S. Hertzberg, K. S. Freed, B. A. Carroll, M. T. Keogan, E. K. Paulson, D. M. DeLong, and R. C. Nelson
Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective Comparison
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 792 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Abramson, N. Walders, K. E. Applegate, R. C. Gilkeson, and M. R. Robbin
Impact in the Emergency Department of Unenhanced CT on Diagnostic Confidence and Therapeutic Efficacy in Patients with Suspected Renal Colic: A Prospective Survey
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1689 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr.
Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Liu, S. J. Esler, B. J. Kenny, R. H. Goh, A. J. Rainbow, and G. W. Stevenson
Low-Dose Nonenhanced Helical CT of Renal Colic: Assessment of Ureteric Stone Detection and Measurement of Effective Dose Equivalent
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 51 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. C. Boridy, A. Kawashima, S. M. Goldman, and C. M. Sandler
Acute Ureterolithiasis: Nonenhanced Helical CT Findings of Perinephric Edema for Prediction of Degree of Ureteral Obstruction
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 663 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Ochi, K. Shimizu, Y. Yasuhara, T. Shigesawa, T. Mochizuki, and J. Ikezoe
Curved Planar Reformatted CT Angiography: Usefulness for the Evaluation of Aneurysms at the Carotid Siphon
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 1999; 20(6): 1025 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. C. Boridy, P. Nikolaidis, A. Kawashima, S. M. Goldman, and C. M. Sandler
Ureterolithiasis: Value of the Tail Sign in Differentiating Phleboliths from Ureteral Calculi at Nonenhanced Helical CT
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 619 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, T. J. Vrtiska, B. F. King, A. J. LeRoy, J. P. Quam, and R. R. Hattery
Image Quality and Dose Comparison among Screen-Film, Computed, and CT Scanned Projection Radiography: Applications to CT Urography
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. A. B. Fowler, J. A. Locken, J. H. Duchesne, and M. R. Williamson
US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.